Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RWR8189
Good for Krauthammer, he has more reason than most to hope for scientific research.

He seems to understand that all needs to not warrent the means of obtaining them.

14 posted on 01/12/2007 4:07:32 AM PST by mware (By all that you hold dear... on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mware
I agree with you....and Krauthammer has long been one of my favorites...

...however, I didn't know his position on abortion...

..and I stand amazed he can defend the right to life of stem cells, but not babies in the womb.

Seems a huge disconnect.

19 posted on 01/12/2007 4:38:30 AM PST by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President....2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mware
This is a revolutionary finding. Amniotic fluid surrounds the baby in the womb during pregnancy. It is routinely drawn out by needle in amniocentesis. The procedure carries little risk and is done for legitimate medical purposes that have nothing to do with stem cells. If it nonetheless yields a harvest of stem cells, we have just stumbled upon an endless supply.

And not just endless, but uncontroversial. No embryos are destroyed. The cells are just floating there, as if waiting for science to discover them.

It has been my understanding that amniocentesis can, and does, often cause spontaneous miscarriage. Additionally, if the needle is not placed correctly, it can do much harm to the fetus. I don't see this as a win win.

24 posted on 01/12/2007 1:17:07 PM PST by jtill (Lord, please keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson