[CWOJackson]

LOL! You're in the same world class he is. You're so damned tightly wrapped in "your" narrow view of the Constitution you don't care about the nation. To the point where you would support a politician who would surrender in time of war simply to sooth your politican angst.

What a tool.

[dcwusmc]

If you read my responses to JimRob, you'd know better than that... but I expect nothing more from you and you have yet to disappoint me.

What I have been saying is that we have not fought to WIN, any more than we did in Vietnam. W has all but squandered our best chance to win by trying to fight a "compassionate" war instead of kicking our enemy in the nuts, then kicking him some more until he can't even move. Now he's into that unconstitutional nation-building thing and more "compassion" and we are just wasting our time and our kids' lives and lots of our national treasure pissing in the wind.

[jmc813]

You're so damned tightly wrapped in "your" narrow view of the Constitution you don't care about the nation.

That's not necessarily a bad thing. I'm sure you would agree that unconstitutional gun laws, on their face, would be supported by most Americans.

[jmc813]

You're so damned tightly wrapped in "your" narrow view of the Constitution you don't care about the nation.

Don't you agree that the Constitution was intentionally written in simple language? Of course one should have a narrow view on it. Taking a broader view is what leads to things like gun laws. Please don't tell me you take an Al Gore "living Constitution" view of things.