Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Congressman Ron Paul files for GOP presidential bid
kristv.com ^ | today

Posted on 01/11/2007 6:06:07 PM PST by Rodney King

Texas Congressman Ron Paul files for GOP presidential bid

HOUSTON -- Ron Paul, the iconoclastic nine-term congressman from southeast Texas, took the first step Thursday toward launching a second presidential bid in 2008, this time as a Republican.

Paul filed incorporation papers in Texas on Thursday to create a presidential exploratory committee that allows him and his supporters to collect money on behalf of his bid. This will be Paul's second try for the White House; he was the Libertarian nominee for president in 1988.

Kent Snyder, the chairman of Paul's exploratory committee and a former staffer on Paul's Libertarian campaign, said the congressman knows he's a long shot.

"There's no question that it's an uphill battle, and that Dr. Paul is an underdog," Snyder said. "But we think it's well worth doing and we'll let the voters decide."

Paul, of Lake Jackson, acknowledges that the national GOP has never fully embraced him despite his nine terms in office under its banner. He gets little money from the GOP's large traditional donors, but benefits from individual conservative and Libertarian donors outside Texas. He bills himself as "The Taxpayers' Best Friend," and is routinely ranked either first or second in the House of Representatives by the National Taxpayers Union, a national group advocating low taxes and limited government.

He describes himself as a lifelong Libertarian running as a Republican.

Paul was not available for comment Thursday, Snyder said.

But he said the campaign will test its ability to attract financial and political support before deciding whether to launch a full-fledged campaign. Snyder said Paul is not running just to make a point or to try to ensure that his issues are addressed, but to win.

Paul is expected to formally announce his bid in the next week or two, Snyder said.

Snyder said Paul and his supporters are not intimidated by the presence of nationally known and better-financed candidates such as Sen. John McCain of Arizona or former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts.

"This is going to be a grassroots American campaign," he said. "For us, it's either going to happen at the grassroots level or it's not."

Paul limits his view of the role of the federal government to those duties laid out in the U.S. Constitution. As a result, he sometimes casts votes that appear at odds with his constituents and other Republicans. He was the only Republican congressman to vote against Department of Defense appropriations for fiscal year 2007.

The vote against the defense appropriations bill, he said, was because of his opposition to the war in Iraq, which he said was "not necessary for our actual security."

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not b


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; antiamerican; awesome; bestrepublican; donquixote; electionpresident; liberal; rlc; ronpaul; sheehansfavorite; spiritofgoldwater; texas; truerepublican; weakonterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 641-660 next last
To: KC Burke
"Remember, there is no thread too small to make some truely harsh comments that will drive away at least one reader who otherwise might be our countryman."

I can't think of anything more harsh then surrendering to our enemies. That alone should drive them away.

201 posted on 01/11/2007 8:30:17 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: KurtZ

The battle of Saigon wasn't a battle, it was shameful surrender (after the military battle had already been won) brought about by the treasonous media and longhaired pinko commie hippy scum. The same people that are working overtime now to lose the battle of Baghdad. And how many millions were killed as a result of us surrendering to the commies in Viet Nam? And how many millions will die now if we surrender to the Islamic Jihadists?


202 posted on 01/11/2007 8:31:23 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: onyx
he's truly a patriot and he has House seniority.

I agree .. and he can be of big help for our military

203 posted on 01/11/2007 8:32:10 PM PST by Mo1 (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

There is no comparsion!!!! I have always maintain that the American people have gone soft. They would rather wait to be killed then to take the offensive to make sure it doesn't happen. I fear the terrorists are correct when they call the United States a paper tiger...inflict enough causalties and they will tuck their tail and run. Politcians are so power hungry they would prefer to destroy the country to get in power. To undermind a commander in chief in a time of war for political gain is nothing short of treason. It's east to retreat. It takes courage and fortitude to stay and fight to get the job done. We seem to have a lot of the first and sadly lacking in the second.


204 posted on 01/11/2007 8:33:09 PM PST by Kath (Luvya Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Unfortunately I think Hunter has the same problem Pence does; he's little known outside of his district and a few activist forums.

Sure, recognition has to start somewere. Why not support them a bit now.. perahps if they get noticed a little in the primaries it will set them up for wider name recongition so they can run again in 4 years. They will never get name recongition if those who like them write them off.

205 posted on 01/11/2007 8:33:42 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Not sure about the Govenor slot ... CA has big liberal cities

Same problem we have in PA


206 posted on 01/11/2007 8:33:48 PM PST by Mo1 (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
WOWZERS! He has been to several of my Christmas parties in Lake Jackson, Texas. Just saw him twice last year. He is a wonderful man, and his wife is a wonderful lady. I would most certainly vote for him. Have known him 33 years.

Please educate me on Ron Paul. Isn't he sort of a Bob Dornan, tell it like he sees it whether anyone likes it or not, kind of guy? If you don't remember Bob Dornan, then just think of John Wayne with an attitude. BTW, I like both Bob Dornan and John Wayne.

207 posted on 01/11/2007 8:34:08 PM PST by jamaly (I evacuate early and often!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Because, of course, during a war it is productive to engage in 9 month long contracting processes?

Certainly not when you're planning to enter a protracted ground engagement.

Immediacy is the mother of big profits.

You mentioned "9 month long". How about this: democracy's are born, but may take a little more than nine months. What's the gestation rate here, boys? Two years, ten years?

What we're looking at is likely a still-birth. And who were we to think we could 'deliver' it in the first place? Shouldn't we have at least had a certification? A plaque on the wall, reserved only to those who've successfully delivered 'democracies' in the past?

If nothing else, we're guilty of practicing without a license. And, I don't care if we made a few bucks in the process, as it is work. Nobody else was willing to try (perhaps that should have been our first clue).

208 posted on 01/11/2007 8:34:52 PM PST by budwiesest (I approve of this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

I don't pretend to know anything about war strategy, (after all, I am a girl) but I can observe. IMO, we're fighting in too much of a PC fashion to please the rest of the world. We're fighting civilians, yet we must take extreme caution to not kill civilians. How does that work?


I support President Bush, our military and the mission. Having an Iraq much along the lines of Muslim Turkey, would (and will) help to serve peace interests in the ME.


209 posted on 01/11/2007 8:35:25 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Absolutely agree with you.


210 posted on 01/11/2007 8:35:59 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Oh good grief.

Do we really need more self-aggrandizing candidates who can't win?

Ron Paul is an important voice in Congress, but he's a non-starter in the Presidential race and everybody who knows anything knows it. He should be focused on winning re-election to the House.


211 posted on 01/11/2007 8:36:06 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Or that he was/is a Libertarian?

Did you know that Ronald Reagan considered libertarianism to be the "heart and soul of conservatism"?

212 posted on 01/11/2007 8:36:14 PM PST by jmc813 (Go Jets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BigTom85

bigtom, *you* made the statement and *you* should be able to back it up with solid links. I am simply challenging your so far unfounded accusation against "the president and his buddies".


213 posted on 01/11/2007 8:36:35 PM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Some of his stuff is good, but more has been bad lately. He's a RINO. He's more of a Libertarian than Republican. Third parties don't cut it. He's more like Pat Buchanan than Republican.

I admit, I don't have much to vote for yet, but I'll wait for Newt before deciding.

214 posted on 01/11/2007 8:36:43 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kath
Take courage. The wife and I have spent a great deal of time with the troops and their families. They know what it's all about.

And when you look at troop morale and recruiting figures you'll see that a whole lot of our young people understand this.

The only way they won't succeed is if they are sold out here at home. The thing to remember is that they aren't the draftees of Vietnam and they don't have the same attitude towards this war as we had in Nam.

They would not take being sold out kindly.

215 posted on 01/11/2007 8:37:31 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: KurtZ
How about the battle of Saigon?

Oh man are you unarmed for this fight. Battle of Saigon? The great 1975 battle?

216 posted on 01/11/2007 8:38:13 PM PST by chesty_puller (USMC 70-73 3MAF VN 70-71 US Army 75-79 3d Inf Old Guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

That's true. After Tet 68, Cronkite pontificated that we had just lost the war in Vietnam and the politicians took him at his word. But I think what McNamara was talking about was that very thing... that the crop of politicians at the time, just as with the current ones, did not have the WILL to see it done... He obviously did not...

And Dubya does not have the will to do what should have been done from the beginning of Iraq: Go in full-bore and don't stop killing people and breaking things until there is ZERO opposition from either the Sunnis OR the Shiite-heads. He tried to fight a "compassionate" war instead of a war of national survival and then tried this "nation-building" thing, for which there is no Constitutional provision. Now I think it's too late in Iraq to go back to the "right" kind of war, so what do we do?


217 posted on 01/11/2007 8:38:34 PM PST by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Exactly so.


218 posted on 01/11/2007 8:38:41 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
He thinks we should do away with the Air Force

Does he really? Weird, considering he was a flight surgeon in the USAF from 1963 to 1968. Maybe he had a bad experience. I'll see if I can find a link where he states his anti-USAF views.

Snap!

219 posted on 01/11/2007 8:39:14 PM PST by jmc813 (Go Jets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming


*** crickets ***


220 posted on 01/11/2007 8:39:35 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 641-660 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson