Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: luckystarmom

There's also a significant rate of false positives for this type of screening, IIRC.


6 posted on 01/11/2007 5:17:31 PM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Sloth
My Brother and his wife got a screen because she was almost 40. The Doctor told them after the results came back that there was an almost certain probability that their child was a Downs baby. There was a ton of hurt in their lives as they struggled for weeks to accept the fate God had given them. They finally got over the pain and planned for the challenge.

Several months later they had a perfect baby boy with no problems whatsoever.

A year later, my wife and I were pressed by her OB to have the test because she was going on 38. We told them no, that no test result would change our approach to having the baby. I bet we had to tell that doctor at least 5 times that we would not have the test, but she kept on giving us emotional reasons that we might need it. I thought I would have to slap the woman before we left.

My suggestion is that since the test is so poor at predicting problems, turn it down. If you would never have an abortion, it will not make a difference. If you would have an abortion, you might kill a healthy baby.

12 posted on 01/11/2007 5:32:55 PM PST by Lowcountry (RIP: Peterdanbrokaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Sloth

There is also an increased chance of miscarriage with the procedure, IIRC.


21 posted on 01/11/2007 6:24:51 PM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson