He's 71 years old. I don't know when that photo at Post 13 was taken, but it wasn't anytime recently.
We've been kinda waiting for him to retire to the fruitcake farm where he can polish the buckles on his shoes and wax eloquent about how the Constitution doesn't authorize an Air Force.
LOL-LOL-LOL
Why do I get the feeling you aren't totally joking.
Is there any reason why the Constitution shouldn't be amended to authorize one?
I would expect pretty strongly that many Air Force construction projects have appropriations longer than two years. That would be constitutional for the Navy, but not for any other branch of the armed services.
How hard should it have been, before authorizing multi-year appropriations for airplanes and equipment, to pass a Constitutional Amendment specifically saying:
You do realize that Paul served in the Air Force, right?