Skip to comments.
No More 'Surge' Protection? Now Oliver North Comes Out Against Iraq Plan
Editor & Publisher ^
| 1/5/07
Posted on 01/11/2007 11:02:47 AM PST by steve-b
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
01/11/2007 11:02:50 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: steve-b
I saw North interviewed after the speech last night on Fox and he was supporting the move.
2
posted on
01/11/2007 11:05:03 AM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: steve-b
I heard North this morning. He has kind of backed off this after the Presidents speech last night.
3
posted on
01/11/2007 11:05:05 AM PST
by
dforest
(Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
To: edcoil
"I saw North interviewed after the speech last night on Fox and he was supporting the move."
I heard the same thing.
Yikes!
4
posted on
01/11/2007 11:07:26 AM PST
by
GottaLuvAkitas1
(Ronald Reagan is the TRUE "Father Of Our Country".)
To: edcoil
I saw the same. He said he probably wouldn't have been in favor of the surge, but he's willing to give the Pres. the benefit of the doubt. At least he was willing last evening.
5
posted on
01/11/2007 11:07:35 AM PST
by
My2Cents
("Friends stab you from the front." -- Oscar Wilde)
To: My2Cents
It may be that the surge is for the coming attack on Iran. But, of course, no one would want to say that right now.
Regards,
Star Traveler
To: steve-b
We live in interesting times.
7
posted on
01/11/2007 11:10:49 AM PST
by
SerpentDove
(It's not rocket surgery.)
To: steve-b
Without a defined mission there is no reason to give the enemy more targets on the ground. Perhaps people are beginning to wake up?
8
posted on
01/11/2007 11:11:04 AM PST
by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
To: steve-b
What the U.S. needs in Iraq is an indefinite timetable to continue doing what it has been doing. If you look at the Iraqi and military blogs there is slow but sure progress--admittedly two steps back, one step forward in some months. The news media has created an alternative reality. But people in Iraq say we are slowly winning.
I think the 20,000-plus new troops, staged in Kuwait, should be shifted between Iraq and Afghanistan as opportunities present themselves.
9
posted on
01/11/2007 11:11:38 AM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: From One - Many
"Without a defined mission????"......WTH are you talking about?
10
posted on
01/11/2007 11:12:02 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(We need to cure Academentia)
To: edcoil
11
posted on
01/11/2007 11:12:27 AM PST
by
Lorianne
To: My2Cents
He said he probably wouldn't have been in favor of the surge, but he's willing to give the Pres. the benefit of the doubt. I have the same feeling. He's the CIC and I've had a belly full of mutiny.
12
posted on
01/11/2007 11:12:52 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Star Traveler
That's entirely possible. I credit Bush with being able to look ahead, and I credit the media with being completely incapable of seeing the big picture.
13
posted on
01/11/2007 11:13:32 AM PST
by
My2Cents
("Friends stab you from the front." -- Oscar Wilde)
To: goodnesswins
Ok, what's the mission then?
14
posted on
01/11/2007 11:13:57 AM PST
by
oolatec
To: edcoil
Same here ... saw Col North's interview. This writer is mischaracterizing on purpose. Col North mentioned his coming 'war stories' coverage of Iraq. It would behoove freepers to watch that episode this weekend. I'll get the dates and post them.
15
posted on
01/11/2007 11:14:51 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: goodnesswins
Why is there is no defined mission. I can see no use in putting in more troops for target practice by the enemy. Take out sadr city or sadr's militia or stay home. I'm tired of this PC war. Allow the military to do what the military does best.....take out the bad guys. The Kurds have their act together, the problems are with the sunnis and shiites. Take the troops out of the north, and go kick butt where necessary.
16
posted on
01/11/2007 11:15:23 AM PST
by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
To: steve-b
This piece smells, no stinks to high Heaven, because Col. North was on Hannity and @#$#$ last night and expressed just the opposite.
The surge only makes sense. With more troops we can train more Iraqis faster, and clean out the bad guys better. You have to explain it in terms that people will understand. If there is a gang infested neighborhood in their city (DC for instance) then you send in more police and the gang activity goes down. But the Dems aren't about winning, nor looking out for the Iraqis.
17
posted on
01/11/2007 11:16:34 AM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Too many morons. So little time.)
To: Lorianne
I say that press conferences are needed and Bush needs to employ guys like Rush and Bill Bennett to get out there (invite a radio talk show host every time he holds a press conference to give him tips and give a pep talk with Bush).
I honestly think the PR with this administration has been its weakest link (and the "lets all get along policy")...Tony Snow has been its 1 positive effect but we need more to battle the thousands of media whores who trample the truth for their own agenda!
To: goodnesswins
He didn't get a phone call from Bush laying it all out to him.
19
posted on
01/11/2007 11:16:46 AM PST
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: Star Traveler
It may be that the surge is for the coming attack on Iran. But, of course, no one would want to say that right now.Nice rhetoric but unrealistic. A ground offensive against Iran would require hundreds of thousands of soldiers, which we don't have. Iran knows this and this is why nutjob keeps running his mouth.
20
posted on
01/11/2007 11:18:11 AM PST
by
OldCorps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson