Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mollohan, (under Justice probe & chair Appropiations Sub.), not working on parts of Justice budget
NLPC ^ | January 11, 2007 | Peter Flaherty

Posted on 01/11/2007 8:09:09 AM PST by Ooh-Ah

NLPC IN THE NEWS


Associated Press
W. Va. Democratic Rep. Steps Aside Amid Probe
Congressman Mollohan Denies Wrongdoing, Calls Concerns 'Rubbish'


WASHINGTON - Rep. Alan Mollohan, under Justice Department investigation about whether he has benefited from directing federal funds to nonprofit groups he helped start, stepped aside Wednesday from working on key elements of the department's budget.

The move came on the day Mollohan, D-W.Va., was named chairman of an Appropriations subcommittee responsible for the department's budget.

Mollohan will not have anything to do with setting the budgets for the attorney general's office, the FBI or the Justice Department's criminal division and prosecuting attorneys, he said in a letter to Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wis. That way, he can't be accused of using his power as payback for the ongoing investigation or to influence it. However, Mollohan will still have a big say in other elements of the agency's budget, including allocation of lawmakers' pet projects such as grants to state and local law enforcement agencies.

At issue is at least $202 million of federal funding that Mollohan has steered to five nonprofit groups in his district - with much of the money going to organizations run by people who contribute to the lawmaker's campaigns.

Last year, Mollohan stepped down from the House ethics committee after media reports into his activities, and the FBI soon launched an investigation. A conservative group, the National Legal and Policy Center, has alleged that the 12-term congressman has undervalued his assets in annual financial disclosure reports.

Mollohan and a political action committee he controls have received more than $146,000 in the past 10 years from donors affiliated with these nonprofits.

Earlier this year, the FBI subpoenaed financial records from the nonprofits, though no charges have been filed.

Mollohan has denied any wrongdoing and made the decision to step aside from the Justice Department budget on his own, said his spokesman, Gerry Griffith.

"These charges are rubbish, and whatever financial success my wife and I have had is a result of my wife's expertise and her years of experience in real estate," Mollohan told his Democratic colleagues at a private meeting.

Mollohan nonetheless opted to take himself out of position to consider "any related Justice Department accounts." "I have never received word from the Justice Department about the scope, nature or state of these inquiries," he said. Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, praised Mollohan and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., "for recognizing that recusal is the appropriate course of action."

Sloan criticized Republicans for not requiring Appropriations Committee members Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., and John Doolittle, R-Calif., also under Justice Department scrutiny, for not making similar moves.

Learn more...

National Legal and Policy Center
Peter Flaherty
President
phone: 703-237-1970



Powered by

NLPC | 107 Park Washington | Falls Church | VA | 20171



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; corruption; earmarking; mollohan; wv

1 posted on 01/11/2007 8:09:19 AM PST by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

This is a big deal. Corruption scandals were the cause cited by exit polls as the reason for voters votes, and corruption scandals, to really get traction, require several explicit indictments.

More dirt MUST be found on Democrats before 2008 to retake Congress. People, get looking, and don't bother sending it to the MSM. It must be explicit criminal indictments and that means it must be evidence that reaches that standard provided to DOJ.


2 posted on 01/11/2007 8:13:30 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Is the Attorney General up from his nap yet ?


3 posted on 01/11/2007 8:17:18 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

This is a meaningless move. What will the result be? He won't vote on amendments, or he won't vote on the budget? What? What? but yet the CREW folks say this is great, and use it to bash republicans.

Fact is the only way to remove the possible conflict is to remove him from the position of leadership. Its being the leader that gives him the power and causes the conflict, not votes on specific parts of the budget.


4 posted on 01/11/2007 8:28:01 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson