Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems to tackle "income inequality"
Townhall.com ^ | January 11, 2007 | Larry Elder

Posted on 01/11/2007 6:22:55 AM PST by Quilla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Arrowhead1952

You guys form a circle, Barney, to tackle the inequality experienced by the guys on doth ends on the line.


41 posted on 01/11/2007 7:25:14 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Only cannibalistic Muslims eat pork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

Most Congressmen were trained as lawyers. 10 years ago good lawyers billed their time at $500/hr. So why do lawyers become congressmen earning $84/hr, instead? Because they are losers.


42 posted on 01/11/2007 7:27:08 AM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

"doth" = both.


43 posted on 01/11/2007 7:27:15 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Only cannibalistic Muslims eat pork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Congress doesn't have much real work to do, so they have to create this 'busy work', to try to fool the boss that they're really working hard.

Just like most offices all over the country. Busy work.


44 posted on 01/11/2007 7:29:05 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

I forgot to add something to my original reply. Remember the phrase years ago? Looks like we will be hearing this for the next two years.

Redistribution of wealth. Redistribution of wealth. Redistribution of wealth. Redistribution of wealth.


45 posted on 01/11/2007 7:30:45 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The terrorists have many allies in the United States, especially in the democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

The Wellstone Syndrome.


46 posted on 01/11/2007 7:30:56 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
Income Inequality is a fine issue to tackle once they've tackled Effort Inequality, Education Inequality, Delayed Gratification Inequality, Ambition Inequality, Leisure time Inequality, and the many other tradeoffs one makes in life. Sure some people have bad situations not of their making, but by and large people can control these choices.

Superbly made argument. Income inequality is the result (with exceptions of course) of all those other inequalities you mentioned above. Why does the govt make no mention of reducing them first ?

47 posted on 01/11/2007 7:31:01 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Hey! Barney! I think you've got your diaper on too tight!


48 posted on 01/11/2007 7:31:15 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

LOL! Losers for sure. They spend 20 million dollars of other losers money every two years, to hold onto their 84 dollar an hour jobs.


49 posted on 01/11/2007 7:32:24 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Only cannibalistic Muslims eat pork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36

Conservatism: Equality of Opportunity.
Liberalism: Equality of Outcome.

That's Conservatism vs. Liberalism in a nutshell.


50 posted on 01/11/2007 7:33:19 AM PST by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Let's see. Worker A and worker B both make $100,000 per year. Worker B gets a $50,000 bonus while Worker B gets no bonus. How does B's bonus work to the detriment of A? While we're at it how do Streisand, Geffen, Spielberg, Buffet and Gates feel about it?


51 posted on 01/11/2007 7:36:23 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

52 posted on 01/11/2007 7:37:26 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

"redistribution of wealth" Oh my ears.....OH MY EARS! That phrase repeated over and over, really does have that sanity shattering drone to it.


53 posted on 01/11/2007 7:39:58 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Only cannibalistic Muslims eat pork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I don't see anyone in congress whining about THEIR golden parachutes. Maybe we could suggest them starting with that. I never could understand why the congressional millionaires accepted the money after they retire. Like, they really need it.


54 posted on 01/11/2007 7:41:04 AM PST by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Bob Nardelli essentially got FIRED as Chairman of the Board for doing a poor job at Home Depot. In spite of that, the Board of Directors voted him a $210 million Golden Parachute at the expense of share holders (that would be the rest of us with mutual funds with Home Depot in our portfolios).

The vast majority of Executives, specifically the ones who are company officers, have employment contracts. The golden parachutes are written into the employment contracts at teh time of hire. The can be specified as stock options, some index to company valuation, profit, etc. This means that the actual value of the severance is not known at the time the contract is signed. When the separation occurs, the Board approves the actual amount they are going to pay on the contract obligation. These types of contracts and subsequent values reflect the competition in the market for top shelf executives.

55 posted on 01/11/2007 7:42:51 AM PST by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, will lie to anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

"Wait a tic ... blimey, this redistribution of wealth is trickier than I thought."

56 posted on 01/11/2007 7:45:31 AM PST by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL!


57 posted on 01/11/2007 7:48:06 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Only cannibalistic Muslims eat pork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Thanks. I think some politicians care not to treat a problem when there is money/power to be acquired in treating the symptom.

The list should also include Risk Taking Inequality.


58 posted on 01/11/2007 7:48:48 AM PST by posterchild (Spent some money on women and beer, the rest was just wasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
I have no problem with inequality, as long as those at the bottom have a reasonable standard of living. The poorest and most vulnerable ought to have three squares a day and a roof over their heads.

Beyond that, devil take the hindmost.

-ccm

59 posted on 01/11/2007 7:53:49 AM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
I think some politicians care not to treat a problem when there is money/power to be acquired in treating the symptom.

Yeah, I know. It was a rhetorical question. :-)

60 posted on 01/11/2007 7:54:36 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson