[robertpaulsen]

"Once again, are you saying that the constitution was never meant to be the supreme law of the land even though it says so?

It is the supreme law of the land. That doesn't mean that everything in it applies to the states, for crying out loud. Why would each state have or need its own constitution?

[smoketree]

So you are saying it applies to the states but not the people?

"That doesn't mean everything in it applies to the states".

You have worked yourself into a corner.

Then according to you it is not the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.

State constitutions cannot violate the U.S. Constitution.
Isn't that why there is a 10th amendment? The federal gov was not meant to run the states it is severely limited by the Constitution and BOR. Everything else is up to the states.
All of the state gun restrictions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL as they violate the supreme law of the land.

Now go ahead and twist that to your hearts content.
I for one am not buying your upside down logic.