[Non-Sequitur]

If an attorney in private practice had defended bank employees criminally charged for shooting a robber (for the use of what some cop deemed to be excessive force), would that disqualify the attorney from prosecuting bank robbers if he were later elected to be prosecuting attorney????

If Paul Morrison decides to appoint his own special prosecutor to investigate abortionists and chooses the head of Planned Parenthood would you expect the investigation to be fair and impartial?

[BlackElk]

I want prosecutors to prosecute criminal violations of the law consistent with the constitution. It is their job. They are PROSECUTORS (advocates, supporters of one side of a legal contest) and they have no business being impartial. If Morrison or any other quisling who once claimed to be Republican but followed his babykilling instincts into the party (Democratic) of babykillers were to investigate Planned Barrenhood, Killer Tiller or any other babykilling person or institution, I would expect a whitewash regardless of the subordinate he appointed. A prosecution of Tiller is NOT a whitewash. It is a prosecution. That is an entirely different question. Since Morrison has no integrity whatsoever (being a pro-abort) what else to expect? I would expect Morrison to be despised by a discerning public until driven from public life. Too bad he got to defect to the Demonrats. He should have been expelled from the GOP for his babykilling sentiments.

Like beauty, "fairness" (the first resort of guilty four-year-olds caught with hand in the same cookie jar as big sister was last week) and "impartiality" are in the eye of the beholder. I think that "fairness" would be the enactment of sane laws punishing abortion, the investigation of Tiller, his indictment, trial, conviction and execution by the same method he uses on the babies. Every bit as fair and impartial as the same course of conduct but leading to Old Sparky for Ted Bundy and the public buying "Bundyburgers" from vendors outside Florida State prison while waiting for the telltale dimming of the lights at the moment of his being broiled internally.

Just in case, there is any question: I also believe that the prosecution to execution of Paul Hill for shotgunning to death an abortionist and his bodyguard at Pensacola was fair and impartial. He violated the law against premeditated murder. He was arrested. He was tried. He was convicted. He was fried (or injected as the case may be). No problem! At least Hill had a noble if not sufficient excuse. His intentions do not make his crime non-criminal.

How many more tens of millions of innocent babies do you want killed by scalpels, chemicals, scissors in the back of the neck, etc., under obviously phony "cover" of SCOTUS imposed social prejudices posing as "law" before the last pro-abort should be purged from the GOP, the last pro-lifer recruited from the Demonratic Party and democracy (consistent with the actual constitution) regains the ability to legislate????