Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's Worse Than Open Borders?
HumanEventsOnline ^ | Jan 10, 2007 | Mac Johnson

Posted on 01/09/2007 9:29:35 PM PST by NapkinUser

Look around you...

When the U.S. is trespassed upon at will by 15 million to 30 million illegal aliens, our border troops are under orders to flee from their posts if attacked, and the only thing upon which President Bush and Speaker Nancy Pelosi agree is the need for amnesty for brazen masses of immigration criminals, it would be easy to say that America has a de facto policy of open borders.

But upon reflection, it must be admitted that our current corruption is worse than open borders. For with a truly open border, oxymoron and nation-killer that that term may be, it could be expected that both the illiterate and the educated would pass easily across it. Likewise, the middle-class and the poor, the peaceful and the violent, the honest and the criminal, and the skilled and the unskilled would be expected to enter into our nation with equal facility.

Yet that is hardly the system we have had imposed upon us by our federal government—for many skilled computer programmers from India are kept out while they await their visas. Educated Chinese scientists cannot find cash-only jobs in our aerospace industry. And the honest of all nations are kept outside our country by their very honesty, except for the small portion of aspiring legal immigrants that, after much paperwork and time and expense, are admitted properly.

And while those who know they will pass background checks wait for them to be performed, while those who would bring the most value to our economy are held up in legal bureaucracy, and while the honest are shocked by the idea of paying criminal gangs to smuggle them across desperate deserts, our current system selects perfectly for their demographic opposites.

For those who are criminals, the border is open.

For those without degrees, the border is open.

For the violent, the dishonest, the unskilled, the destitute, the illiterate … the border is open.

And so they flow in by the millions each year—unfettered by the compunctions that keep out their moral betters, and undaunted by the need for unforged documents that keeps out their intellectual betters (for high tech businesses have too much to at stake to play the “wink, wink, nudge, nudge” game with fake IDs and random Social Security numbers).

No, we do not have an open border. We have an anti-border.

Where a real border is designed to keep out the bad of the world and let flow in all its good, our anti-border keeps out the good and drowns us in the bad.

Where a real border is intended to politically define a distinct nation, our anti-border is intended to redefine that nation into something indistinct.

Where a real border is supposed to declare to the outsider and the would-be entrant, “Here begins a new set of laws,” our anti-border declares to them “Here begins whatever lawlessness you need to get by.”

With this selection process in place, we are supposed to believe that our economy is benefited?

It would be as if a world-class company suddenly stopped interviewing applicants for new positions and simply gave the jobs to whomever managed to break into the building the night before. While titans of industry brag that much of their success is attributable to picking good people and letting them work their talents in service of the common good (Jack Welch, I believe, once jokingly claimed to be the Chief Human Resources Officer of GE), our nation is pursuing the opposite approach.

We most heavily add to our national organization those that first break laws, fake their resumes, pay bribes, evade their taxes, communicate poorly, have few legitimate skills and disrespect our culture.

For people such as these, our borders are open, and amnesty is a civil right.

For the people we really need, however, our border is mockingly closed, and amnesty is just a word for their place being taken by some lesser man.

We have, in short, the worst of all possible systems.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: NapkinUser; upchuck; AmericanExceptionalist; wolfcreek; B4Ranch; SJackson; NavySon; donmeaker; ...
BUMP!

Great post!

These are some of the most salient, ascerbic and acutely incisive points I have ever seen marshalled against the Adminstration's and the RATs policies in three concise sentences...[Victor Davis Hanson would be proud!]:

Where a real border is designed to keep out the bad of the world and let flow in all its good, our anti-border keeps out the good and drowns us in the bad.

Where a real border is intended to politically define a distinct nation, our anti-border is intended to redefine that nation into something indistinct.

Where a real border is supposed to declare to the outsider and the would-be entrant, “Here begins a new set of laws,” our anti-border declares to them “Here begins whatever lawlessness you need to get by.”


21 posted on 01/13/2007 9:33:20 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Well, actually if the United States does not control its border, criminal organizations like M-13 will be glad to collect "taxes", baksheesh, protection, or "insurance" from people who want to cross.

This will assure that people who may desire to work honestly will be willing to take any criminal activity that comes their way. Most car dealerships in California pay some form of protection to organized crime: they have to, since they carry enough inventory that a few rocks could drive them out of business.


22 posted on 01/13/2007 5:04:40 PM PST by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

This is an email I just received:

Subject: Turn in employers who hire illegal aliens

U.S. BORDER CONTROL

Turn in employers who hire illegal aliens

Believe it or not, reports are starting to come in from all over the country that ICE is suddenly interested in learning about employers who hire illegal aliens. We are hearing that citizens who report employers who knowingly
are hiring illegal aliens, are getting a good response.

The new number to call to report employers who are knowingly hiring quantities of illegal aliens is (toll free): 1-866-DHS-2-ICE Apparently, after years of ignoring our calls it appears that the agency is putting on a new face, perhaps, for the new Congress. Whether this new initiative will be long-term or short-lived is anybody's guess. But the time to make those calls is now.

How it works: You are not required to provide your identity toICE. All that is necessary to request an investigation by ICE is mere suspicion of employers hiring illegals. But any kind of documentation or eye witness to such activities
only increases the odds that they will act.

Both ICE and the IRS are especially interested in "visiting" those businesses that employ ILLEGALS
"off the books" to avoid the payment of payroll taxes.Small and large businesses are equally notorious in the hiring of ILLEGAL aliens toavoid paying fair wages to its workers and to criminally evade the collection and payment of payroll taxes. Whether the business hires one ILLEGAL alien or several hundred, ICE and IRS want to know about it.

We would appreciate it if you would let us know how helpful or unhelpful ICE has been in taking your information and following up on your complaint.

And we will pass that information on to Congressmen who are monitoring their activities. Thank you.



Revised: December, 2006 Contact us at webmaster@usbc.org (c) 2006
U.S. Border Control


23 posted on 01/15/2007 9:49:07 PM PST by B4Ranch (Press "1" for English, or Press "2" and you will be disconnected until you learn to speak English.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Wow! Took 'em six years to reverse course to implement this. Six years lost.


24 posted on 01/16/2007 9:53:40 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Why try to fix it? Nothing is ever good enough.


25 posted on 01/16/2007 9:58:39 AM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson