[plain talk]

To justify his socialist brainchild, Romney uses the argument that it is no different from requiring people to carry car insurance.

Well Romney has a point. This is requiring people to have a certain type of insurance - health in this case. Not saying I am for forcing people to have health insurance but there is a big difference between this and Ted Kennedy's proposals where government pays for the health care. So lumping Romney in there with Kennedy is overkill.

Based on the sloppy agenda driven writing I completely dismiss this entire article as garbage. I'll get my information from other sources.

[Finny]

Mandatory health insurance cannot be compared to car insurance! You have car insurance because you drive. What, you have to have health insurance because you live?

I find the whole concept absurd and invasive and unconstitutional.

[garjog]

"forcing people to have health insurance"

Wouldn't forcing people to get health insurance be better than the socialists ruining our health care system with a government take over?