Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirLinksalot
Romney wasn't going to support an amendment before the decision because it would have been taken as a provocation, and really, who would have expected the court to come up with such a bizarre decision?

If he'd had access to a lot of information about what the courts would do, and if he'd been prepared to really strain himself and his credibility to carry such a measure beforehand, it still wouldn't have put the amendment through.

So, this article looks a lot like hindsight to me. You can come along afterwards and say, "at this point, he should have acted," but at the time Romney probably didn't have the information that we all have after the fact.

5 posted on 01/09/2007 3:15:40 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: x; All
Every FReeper should have this info about the real Romney
7 posted on 01/09/2007 3:32:19 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson