Posted on 01/09/2007 8:27:45 AM PST by jmc813
Used to read all three but the Barb was the worst and lowest. I was leftist, that's why I understand the left so well. "Politically correct" meant something else back then
I only saw a few issues of the Barb, but I did read RAMPARTS often and I also read some of the other "local" underground rags. The EVO made THE VILLAGE VOICE look conservative, by comparison.
Are you pro life.
Ramparts at least was a literate magazine. Yes the EVO was the bad boy version of the Village Voice. Used to read both
Yes; why?
I read the VV and the EVO, besides several other papers, back then. I lived in the Village ( the WEST VILLAGE; the then still NICE part ), at the time and saw the invading hordes up close and personal. Most of them were "weekend hippies" and wannabes; others were the serious scum who were their pied pipers.
First,i am not mad at you any more,2nd just checking.
I never lived in "the Village" but used to visit often. Friends that lived there and for various events
Oh, okay....
My now husband lived on Jane Street, three bocks over, when we met and were courting.
After we were married, we moved a bit uptown, but still had friends who lived in the Village, so we would still go there to see them and to go to restaurants that we liked and such.
What time span are you talking about? I wonder if we were there at the same time, is all.
About 66-67.
Actually, that was the Bilderberg conference.
Bilderberg 'performance' key to Edwards VP pick
You may recall that then Governor Clinton attended in 1991, and Hillary attended last year's conference in Canada.
RI DIC U LUS
A Cindy Sheehan would not only not been a "leader" she would not have even registered on the public's senses.
And! in the past they could express themselves without the F-word.
Poor Dennis. Still allergic to facts.
Perfectly familiar with it. The notion that there are issues needing to be addressed, simply means that we need an honorable party on the other side...and we wait until we get it. No honor on their side...no deal.
No amount of paper will suddenly transform an "agreement" with a dishonorable rat into a squeaky-clean one. The Reagan requirement of "Trust, but Verify" would be the place to start in establishing some degree of trust. Say we simply require "Automatic" retributions...to more or less correct...and swiftly...the "imperfections" (i.e., cheating) as discovered by our USTR. If these were put in place first, likely in a single page, and the other side agreed to it, we would have seen a step in the right direction as to establishing the "honor" on the other side.
China, for one, would never agree to a contract which had such a simple, and inarguable set of clauses.
Same time period. :-)
And that's why Michael invited Corsi to be on his program.
No- wait- nevermind.
So true. I recall one who quoted a book on financial bubbles and managed to turn the author's argument on its head.
Now there's a substantive argument. The logic courses you took to earn a math degree must have been truly demanding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.