Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UWconservative

Eh, this happened multiple times with both Anthrax and Ricin.

Identifying substances accurately is really advanced-degree chemistry work in a lab - but you have all this equipment issued for field use now used by people that don't REALLY understand its capabilities.

Field anthrax tests test for substances that MIGHT be anthrax or MIGHT be ricin - and we saw false positives time after time, but also local agencies issuing press releases or giving press conferences that were leaving out the "might" and maybe."

Presumably this test simply test for nitrogen compounds, as virtually all explosives contain nitrogen compounds..however the users of the tests or spokesmen literally thought it was a test for "C4."


93 posted on 01/08/2007 2:08:58 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist
Presumably this test simply test for nitrogen compounds, as virtually all explosives contain nitrogen compounds..however the users of the tests or spokesmen literally thought it was a test for "C4."

Exactly. Crank up the sensitivity on the detector, it will tell you that that bag of spinach you just tossed in is really enough explosive to level Miami.

96 posted on 01/08/2007 2:11:46 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson