Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gorzaloon
It depends on what method they were using. IR could be fooled, nitrosyl specific methods would not have been.

Which type of test is more likely to be used, based on practical considerations such as cost, ease of use and so forth?

145 posted on 01/08/2007 4:17:47 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Which type of test is more likely to be used, based on practical considerations such as cost, ease of use and so forth?

They were probably relying on that swipe test. If the package was in a remote area it is doubtful they would have moved it to a large machine like this one:

http://www.lifesafetysys.com/osb/itemdetails.cfm/ID/379

Here is where it can fail...Just suppose someone had fired a gun or handled one that had been fired...Like... for example, whatever agent was taking the swipes. Or suppose someone had been exposed to some other organonitrate..for example, wearing a transderm nitro patch!

The machine would see the swipe sample, and go bananas.

151 posted on 01/08/2007 5:11:45 PM PST by Gorzaloon (Global Warming: A New Kind Of Scientology for the Rest Of Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson