Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-Chivas
Gee whiz, I think the earmark-outings is a victory for fiscal conservatives.

Before we break out the champagne, maybe we should wait and see just how Nancy and her DBM cheerleaders define "earmarks."

18 posted on 01/08/2007 12:31:22 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - Don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: CFC__VRWC
There should be a complete transparency, not just earmark transparency. Every single paragraph, sentence, word and punctuation mark should be liked back the the Congressmen who put them in, the committee which approved them and who voted for or against it. I should be able to click anywhere on a bill on the web to see exactly how that part of the bill was put in. Never again should Byrd or Stevens be able to sneak things into bills and be allowed to shrug their shoulders about how in the world could that suspicious appropriation just fall into a bill.

There should also be no secret holds on bills or nominations. If a Congressman feels strongly enough to put a stop to something, he should proudly go to the podium and tell the world what he is doing and why.

22 posted on 01/08/2007 12:40:24 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Baker's Iraq Surrender Group - warming up the last helicopter out of Baghdad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson