Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

The Topper radiocarbon date shows a classic symptoms
of "fringe" science: results that at the edge of resolution
or near the noise floor of any particular measurement method.
He's close to the edge of the ability of radiocarbon dating
(about 60K years), and the anthropogenic origin of his stone
tools is in question.
Time will tell, though. Plate techtonics was hinted at in
the 16th century, and again in 1912, but took another fifty
years after that to become widely accepted.


27 posted on 01/08/2007 12:07:27 PM PST by prodigals son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: prodigals son

Always listen to experts.
They'll tell you what can't be done, and why.
Then do it.

LAZARUS LONG


30 posted on 01/08/2007 12:14:13 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: prodigals son
Time will tell, though. Plate tectonics was hinted at in the 16th century, and again in 1912, but took another fifty years after that to become widely accepted.

In part because the mechanism was missing from the theory. I find it interesting that even objects suspected of being made by humans require multiple lines of reasoning and evidence to distinguish them from natural formations.

31 posted on 01/08/2007 12:15:01 PM PST by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson