Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whither the Scots? (Independence on the near horizon?)
National Post - Canada ^ | Monday, January 08, 2007 | John O' Sullivan

Posted on 01/08/2007 10:30:49 AM PST by GMMAC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: UWconservative; Borges
Historians estimate that the free population of Athens in the 5th century BC was about 15-20 thousand. Maybe 40,000 for Renaissance Florence.

The population of England during the Elizabethan Age was probably 1.5-2 million with a London population of 150,000.

41 posted on 01/08/2007 1:21:51 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
It's currently about 55/45 Protestant, and the Catholic birthrate is dropping - but not as quickly as the Protestant birthrate.

In 20 years there will likely be a Catholic majority.

42 posted on 01/08/2007 1:23:53 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
And the Scots today bear little resemblance to William Wallace, since the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish National Party are aggressively socialist and believe in coercively disarming the people.

And lets not forget how they just seem to be kissing Muslim Butt left and right either

43 posted on 01/08/2007 1:53:21 PM PST by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude; GMMAC; Borges
The interesting thing about Scotland is that in the century following the Act Of Union there was a Scottish Renaissance that produced its finest poet (Burns), one of the world's greatest economists (Adam Smith), one of history's key engineers (James Watt), one of the world's finest biographers (James Boswell), and some of the most influential philosophers (Francis Hutcheson, David Hume).

All of this intellectual ferment happened in and around Edinburgh and Glasgow, cities of maybe 50,000 people each.

44 posted on 01/08/2007 2:02:23 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Don't forget Thomas Reid!

Without Reid...(perhaps) no Witherspoon...without Witherspoon...(perhaps) no Madison...without Madison...(perhaps) no Constitution.

Yes, you are right. The Scottish Renaissance is very important, indeed.


45 posted on 01/08/2007 2:56:15 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Reese Witherspoon is a descendant of that particular Signer.


46 posted on 01/08/2007 3:06:20 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

It's not right for the elite in one country to block attempts of people in another country to start businesses then to blame them for taking more tax revenues for survival.


47 posted on 01/08/2007 3:11:55 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
The Scots would still be living in huts and sh*tting in holes if it weren't for the Brits.

I quite like sh*tting in a hole.

48 posted on 01/08/2007 3:48:27 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
It would be the worst thing that ever happened to Scotland since the Battle of Flodden

They would immediately try to tax themselves into prosperity!

An independent Scotland without the North Sea oil revenue would last about 10 minutes. There is no indigenous industry and not much for resources.

Scotland's people were its greatest export....

49 posted on 01/08/2007 3:58:40 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith (There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
Someplace I have read that the first English dictionary defined oats as a cereal which is fed to men in Scotland and to horses in England.
After reading this some Scottish parson exclaimed, that's why England is noted for the quality of its horses; and Scotland is noted for the quality of its men.
50 posted on 01/08/2007 5:35:56 PM PST by curmudgeonII (One man...and the Lord...are a majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
I'll stand by my openly credited source, Duncan A. Bruce, since given the esteemed view Burke's Peerage takes of his scholarship, it will surely take considerably more than your mere nay-saying to refute it.
51 posted on 01/08/2007 6:42:47 PM PST by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

He may be a good historian of Scotland. But he doesn't know squat about American history. I'll stand by my facts. Your source can have his opinions.


52 posted on 01/08/2007 6:57:49 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
In yet another move positively worthy of Karl Rove, Harper simultaneously thoroughly out maneuvered the separatist Bloc Quebecois & compelled the Liberals & NDP to support the Conservative government's stated policy with respect to Quebec.
There's a good summary here & you can easily find out more by Googling 'news: Harper + Quebec + nation'.
53 posted on 01/08/2007 6:59:51 PM PST by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

LOL!


54 posted on 01/08/2007 7:02:40 PM PST by Pyro7480 ("Give me an army saying the Rosary and I will conquer the world." - Pope Blessed Pius IX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
Bruce is actually an American historian of Scots descent and you seem to have your so far unsubstantiated opinions confused with facts he's established through his well recognized scholarship.
55 posted on 01/08/2007 7:06:25 PM PST by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
Do you know "The Lament for the Union of Scotland and England"?

It's a piobaireachd but I've taken out some of the grace notes and play it as a slow air - very pretty.

http://www.musicaviva.com/midi/music.tpl?filnavn=lament-union-bpe2
56 posted on 01/08/2007 9:05:01 PM PST by decal (Too many people mistake "tolerance" for "approval.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son

I sincerely hope that you are joking....

Firstly Britain is England,Scotland,Wales and Northern Ireland.So like most Americans,when you bang on about 'the Brits' it is clear you havent got a clue what you are talking about....England and Britain are not the same,got that?.

Oh as for our 'barbarity'....just remember that the Celts and Picts were creating art and literature when England's Anglo-Saxon forebears didnt even have a written language....


57 posted on 01/15/2007 2:38:39 PM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

touchy, touchy.

you sound like one of the cavemen in the Geico commercials. Lighten up.


58 posted on 01/15/2007 2:40:27 PM PST by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Wideawake:

1--The English did not 'conquer' Scotland in 1290,in fact that year the two nations signed the Treaty of Birham which specifically states that England had no legal right to claim overlordship of Scotland.

2--The physical occupation of Scotland took place only in 1296,not 1290.

3--Not only did the Scots expel the English in 1314 from Scotland after Bannockburn,BUT you are amazingly ignoring the 1328 Treaty of Northampton where England legally recognised Scotland's existance as an independent nation.


59 posted on 01/15/2007 2:43:02 PM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son

Touchy I may be,but mate,I make it a habit to know my stuff before I post....

Perhaps you should too.

Confusing England and Britain is schoolboy stuff and plays right into our stereotype of the geographically and historically ignorant 'Yank'.


60 posted on 01/15/2007 2:45:35 PM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson