Posted on 01/08/2007 9:40:00 AM PST by Ellesu
United Van Lines Releases 2006 Migration Study:
A strong mobility pattern continued in 2006 as many Americans packed up their belongings and headed to the West and Southeast parts of the country, while the Central Northeast region of the country experienced an increase in residents departing. The statistics are among the findings of United Van Lines 30th annual migration study that tracks where its customers, over the last 12 months, moved from and the most popular destinations. The findings were announced by Carl Walter, vice president of United Van Lines, the nations largest household goods mover.
United has tracked shipment patterns annually on a state-by-state basis since 1977. For 2006, the accounting is based on the 227,254 interstate household moves handled by United among the 48 contiguous states, as well as Washington, D.C. In its study, United classifies each state in one of three categories -- high inbound (55% or more of moves going into a state); high outbound (55% or more of moves coming out of a state); or balanced. Although the majority of states were in the balanced category last year, several showed more substantial population shifts.
MOVING IN Known for hospitality and gracious style, the Southeast states welcomed many new residents in 2006, with North Carolina coming in as the top destination (64.0% inbound). South Carolina (60.6%) continued its 13-year inbound tradition, while Alabama (57.5%) experienced its fourth year as a high-inbound location. Although Tennessee saw less people move in this year (55.8% in 2006; 58.0% in 2005), it still captured a spot on the high-inbound list.
Although not considered high inbound, other southeastern states also greeted new residents. Kentucky (52.9%) continued its five-year inbound trend; Georgia (53.9%) continued its 25-year trend as an inbound state; and Mississippi (50.1%) boasted a 3.2% increase in moves to its state as compared to 2005.
Supporting the idea that Americans still believe there is fortune to be found in the West, the Western portion of the country emerged as a top migration spot. Capturing the No. 2-inbound ranking, Oregon (62.5%) sustained its 19-year, high-inbound trend. While still a high-inbound state, Arizona (55.4%) saw roughly 5% less people move in than last year; however, Nevada (59.9%) continued its lucky streak of being high inbound since 1986.
Both New Mexico (57.9% inbound; a 3.7% increase) and Utah (56.0% inbound; nearly 6% increase) saw a rise of incoming residents as compared to last years data. Idahos (59.3% inbound) high-inbound ranking has held steady for the past 19 years; and Montana (55.0% inbound) retained its five-year inbound status.
Although not considered high inbound, other Western states witnessed increases of incoming moves as compared to last year: Colorado (54.7% inbound) continued its four-year inbound trend and had 1.2% increase, and Wyoming (54.4% inbound) boasted a 4.3% increase.
Rounding out the of high-inbound list are Washington, D.C. (57.9%), which has remained inbound since the first year of the study, and South Dakota (55.9%), which enjoyed its first high-inbound year since 1994.
Some other noteworthy inbound-migration states in 2006:
Texas (54.6%) continued inbound movement since 1989 and saw slightly (0.7%) more people move in as compared to last year.
After being outbound last year, Nebraska (52.5% inbound) turned a new leaf and has 3.2% more moves in as compared to 2005.
Although it is considered a balanced state, Oklahoma (50.0%) saw a 3% increase over last years numbers.
This year marked the first time in 25 years that Minnesota (51.3%) saw more people entering than leaving. MOVING OUT States in the Central Northeast generally showed an outbound trend, according to Uniteds records. Ranked No. 2 on the high-outbound list last year, Michigan (66.0%) moved up a spot to tie for the top outbound state on this years list. Michigan saw a 2.1% increase over its 2005 numbers.
Other Central Northeast states that made the high-outbound list were: New York (59.5%), which has been an outbound state since the survey was established; Indiana (58.2%), which has been high outbound since 1993; and Illinois (55.7%), which has been high outbound since the surveys inception. Also continuing outbound traditions, New Jersey (60.9%, outbound since 1997), Pennsylvania (57.0%, high outbound for the past three years), and Ohio (55.8%, outbound since 1992) saw residents depart.
Rounding out the high-outbound states, Louisiana (56.4%) continued its two-year, high-outbound trend, but did see 1.5% less people leave as compared to last years numbers. Continuing its reign as the top outbound state of 2005, North Dakota (66.0%) tied this year with Michigan for the state that lost the most residents. The year of 2006 marked the eleventh consecutive year that North Dakota has been classified as high outbound.
Not identified as high outbound, but following the outbound trend in the Central Northeastern part of the country, Connecticut (52.4%) saw its fourth successive year of out-migration and Maryland (54.1%) continued its 15-year outbound tradition.
Some other noteworthy outbound states in this years study were:
California (52.4%) saw its lowest outbound percentage in four years. Missouri (51.8%) continued its 12-year outbound trend and had 1% more residents leave as compared to last year. Wisconsin (53.2%) witnessed its lowest outbound influx since 2000.
Walter said the United Van Lines study, through the years, has been shown to accurately reflect the general migration patterns in various regions of the country. He also noted that real estate firms, financial institutions, and other observers of relocation trends regularly use the United data in their business planning and analysis activities.
United Van Lines, with headquarters in suburban St. Louis, maintains a network of 1,000 affiliated agencies throughout the world. As the nations largest mover, United holds more than 30 percent of the market, which is nearly double the market share of the second largest carrier. More information about United and its services can be obtained through the companys Web site at www.unitedvanlines.com.
VERTY interested to see what you guys have to say about this. I've heard MANY times how bad this is for the Dems, (NY gets small, SC gets big) but the way I see it, NY stays lib and SC BECOMES lib. That appears to be what we have in VA. So many of these F&*%ing POS scumbags are coming in, that VA is now indistinguishable from MASS.
Good, there are too many people in my state anyway.
Well, LA is becoming a red state, and many LA Dems outmigrated to Texas and other states:)
You know the difference between a yankee and a d@mnyankee?
The second one stays.
What's the bag limit in your area?
what you are seeing here is why the US is drifting left politically - as people move to the "inbound" states, they bring their politics with them.
Bookmark.
everything I've read says it should.
If liberal states are staying liberal and conservative states are becoming liberal, that isn't really about migration, it actually means something worse: that nationwide older conservatives are dying off and younger people and immigrants are voting liberal. An ominous sign. If younger people were leaving the Northeast to look for jobs and bringing a conservative, enterpreneurial spirit with them, the symptoms you describe in Virginia wouldn't be happening.
Democrat party fiefdoms despise families, despite all their total BS rhetoric. Such regions are funtionally uninhabitable.
Think San Francisco, Boston, Chicago, Manhattan, Northern New Jersey and all of Taxachusetts.
It is true what you say about Virginia.
While it has not achieved true battleground status, there is an increasing number of Dems coming in, primarily in Northern Virginia.
Twenty years ago, Northern Va was considered the GOP part of the state. Nowadays, it seems as though the Valley, the Piedmont and Southside have earned that honor.
As federal govt continues to grow and grow, Northern Va will become more and more Dem - to the point where it can dictate to the rest of the state.
The phrase "Rats leaving a sinking (liberal) ship" comes to mind.
most of the outflow has to do with cost of living, taxes, and the wages you need to earn to live well in those areas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.