In addition, Israel would be reluctant to use a WMD that could MB>set off a regional war.
Regional war?!?!? YAAKOV KATZ must be on crack.
The next country that uses a nuke starts WWIII (or IV or V, take your pick of terms). And personally I don't want to get incinerated by a Russian nuke because Israel has a problem with Iran.
Is there any sense that the US should have any input into Israel's use of nukes if US support, and potentially US blood, are much of the reason Israel is prepared to deal with response?
I don't disagree with much of what Israel does. What I disagree with is blind loyalty.
Just a thought.
I don't think Russia will launch against us in the event of an Israeli attack on Iran. $6.00 gas is much more likely. In either case I don't think Israel will consent to extermination for our benefit.
"The next country that uses a nuke starts WWIII (or IV or V, take your pick of terms). And personally I don't want to get incinerated by a Russian nuke because Israel has a problem with Iran."
Put the bong down, Condor51.
If Israel nukes all Muslims everywhere in the Mid Ease, and the 'Stans', Russia would be happy to be rid of them.
Look at Russian history under Stalin. He spent quite a bit of time and effort killing Muslims in the Caucasus.
PS Israel's problem with Islamic terrorists today, OUR's
tomorrow - 'member 9/11?
You'd rather be incinerated by an Iranian nuke because Isreal didn't act?
(Of course, that's not terribly likely, because nearly half of this country would vote to surrender to Islam's demands rather than stand and fight for the future of mankind.)
why would Russia nuke the US to protect Iran?
This a very deep thought... Would you prefer to be incinerated by Iranian nukes?
Funny Guy!!!