We're not voting for a saint or a virgin, we're voting for someone who's tough and smart and electable.
> We're not voting for a saint or a virgin, we're voting for someone who's tough and smart and electable
There's a difference between a normal "non-saint" and someone with chronic infidelity and honesty problems.
Last thing we need is another bout of Clinton style ethics in the White House.
Concur about the saint/virgin part, but tough/smart/electable doesn't mean squat unless the politics of the candidate in question are conservative. .....and Rudy's qualifications on that front are highly questionable, to put it mildly.