Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

We're not voting for a saint or a virgin, we're voting for someone who's tough and smart and electable.


80 posted on 01/07/2007 12:39:37 PM PST by tkathy (Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tkathy

> We're not voting for a saint or a virgin, we're voting for someone who's tough and smart and electable

There's a difference between a normal "non-saint" and someone with chronic infidelity and honesty problems.

Last thing we need is another bout of Clinton style ethics in the White House.


86 posted on 01/07/2007 12:44:48 PM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: tkathy
"We're not voting for a saint or a virgin, we're voting for someone who's tough and smart and electable."

Concur about the saint/virgin part, but tough/smart/electable doesn't mean squat unless the politics of the candidate in question are conservative. .....and Rudy's qualifications on that front are highly questionable, to put it mildly.

99 posted on 01/07/2007 12:57:13 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson