Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Popocatapetl
If you actually read the entire article, you'll see that the author refutes the initial thesis that two highly intelligent parents produce one autistic child. Thus:

Demographics are always tricky to decipher, and it is easy to make too much of too little, but at some point all sorts of families began having autistic kids, and that ominous pattern may well be visible in the first 100 cases.

The latest research (not from 1938) that I've seen on the causes of autism seems to show at least one link to older fathers.

32 posted on 01/07/2007 12:58:42 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert (Kelo must GO!! ..... http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Hetty_Fauxvert

Nothing is terribly clear in complex genetics. For example a predisposition to autism that doesn't manifest as autism may tend to make people very intelligent.

There may be an environmental window for an outside factor to occur to activate autism; if the child makes it past that window, they are no longer susceptible.

I agree that parental age may be a factor, but is it age, or is it something else the parents "picked up" along the way, like smoking, drinking, diet, etc., that had a cumulative effect.

And yet, in practical terms, intelligent people may well be statistically more likely to have autistic children.

But as with another recent discovery, Fragile X Syndrome, it might be very obvious or very subtle.


33 posted on 01/07/2007 1:21:00 PM PST by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson