Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball
>> You may not personally like the course of treatment they followed,

There was no course of treatment.

The case was not about courses of treatment.

Judges may not legally practice medicine any more than guardians may practice medicine. They do not decide courses of treatment. They have no qualifications to do so.

There was no treatment involved, ever. In fact, Michael cut off all therapy for Terri in 1993. She never again was given the care that the jury award specified. Her trust fund was stolen by a dishonest judge and conniving lawyers who then used it to kill her.

I trust this does not meet your standards of private family medical decisions.

163 posted on 01/09/2007 11:26:48 AM PST by T'wit (The good news is, lots of people have agreed with you. The bad news is, they were Nazis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit
The case was not about courses of treatment.

The case was about whether Terri's guardian could determine the course of her treatment, as advised by her doctors.

164 posted on 01/09/2007 12:01:58 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson