Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

There is that potential, I agree.

I thik it can be countered by having a good deal of coverage and a well publicized registration period prior to the intitiation of the protocol.

Plus I wouldn't actually refuse a non-donor, I'd just put them at the bottom of the potential recipient list. That way no organs wold go to waste and there'd be a clear cut, good reason why the guy didn't get the transplant: someone else did.

It is also my hope that such a protocol would result in so many organs being potentially available tat the subject wouldn't arise.


16 posted on 01/06/2007 6:49:34 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.

I think I agree with you that it might be a good way to do it. I think it could only improve the process. And a lot more organs might be available. I like it.


22 posted on 01/06/2007 2:44:00 PM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson