Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightinthemiddle
Baker's surrender strategy was - and is -- also the core of his foreign policy theory. He, like many of his background and age, are stability addicts. To gain stability - on domestic or foreign fronts - he's willing to trade more than it is worth. Trying to prop up Gorbachev, Baker opposed American support for Balkan freedom, nearly getting into a fistfight with fellow cabinet member Jack Kemp over it. Now, when the Iranian mullahs are beset by falling oil production and growing internal unrest, Baker wants to make it harder for Iranians to overthrow the mullahs just like he wanted to make it harder for Latvia and Lithuania to shake off the shackles of the Soviets.

Just about sums up James Baker's resume.

9 posted on 01/05/2007 10:03:38 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

And people wonder why America always sought to prop up dictators around the world in the last 75 years! It was because of people like James Baker. THe very same Baker who sold Reagan down the river and started the whole Iran/Contra scandal.


18 posted on 01/05/2007 10:17:07 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson