Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
Actually in many cases the CO2 increase was after a temperature increase.


<<<-------longer ago --------- more recent-------->>>
<<<------Temperature --------- CO2------->>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<<<-------more recent --------- longer ago-------->>>
<<<------CO2 --------- Temperature------->>>

6 posted on 01/05/2007 9:59:13 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman

what I should say is - "a CO2 change was after a temperature change."


8 posted on 01/05/2007 10:02:06 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

Its terrible - we haven't seen these kinds of temperature increases since 125,000 years ago (and 225,000 and 325,000 and 425,000 years ago).

Luckily I have a $1 million dollar grant that is funding my research into determining if temperture variations are cyclical. Early models are inconclusive and it will no doubt require more time and money.


26 posted on 01/05/2007 10:48:59 AM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson