To: presidio9
Actually in many cases the CO2 increase was
after a temperature increase.
<<<-------longer ago --------- more recent-------->>>
<<<------Temperature --------- CO2------->>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<<-------more recent --------- longer ago-------->>>
<<<------CO2 --------- Temperature------->>>
6 posted on
01/05/2007 9:59:13 AM PST by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
To: dynoman
what I should say is - "a CO2 change was after a temperature change."
8 posted on
01/05/2007 10:02:06 AM PST by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
To: dynoman
Its terrible - we haven't seen these kinds of temperature increases since 125,000 years ago (and 225,000 and 325,000 and 425,000 years ago).
Luckily I have a $1 million dollar grant that is funding my research into determining if temperture variations are cyclical. Early models are inconclusive and it will no doubt require more time and money.
26 posted on
01/05/2007 10:48:59 AM PST by
geopyg
(Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson