Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lastchance
I wrote what I did as a suggestion that she show her husband the contribution stay at home moms make to the household.

I see. I had interpreted her comment to mean that her husband was upset over having to share child-care duties so that she could continue working. This illustrates (additionally) what a poor communicator the author is!

114 posted on 01/05/2007 12:34:59 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Everything is either willed or permitted by God, and nothing can hurt me." Bl. Charles de Foucauld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
I see. I had interpreted her comment to mean that her husband was upset over having to share child-care duties so that she could continue working. This illustrates (additionally) what a poor communicator the author is!

here here. I thought the same exact thing and I agree with many that her initial management direction to the babysitter was to leave the baby at home sleeping and then come to the coffee house. Even though that was completely ridiculous and stupid, this is what it sounded like.

God help that this woman if she ever leaves this child again. The 'babysitter' will need to be a solid knowledgeable care giver and have a decoder ring!

135 posted on 01/05/2007 8:22:43 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson