Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AlaninSA; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...


2 posted on 01/04/2007 5:52:15 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, insects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coleus

Life begins when God says it does.


3 posted on 01/04/2007 5:56:08 PM PST by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
Contacted by the woman’s representatives and touched by her plight, Lejeune testified there is indisputable scientific evidence that human life begins at conception. “I asked the judge to make the decision of Solomon and give the embryos to the parent who wanted them to live,” he recalled. Lejeune’s point was that an embryo has a human nature from the very beginning and should not be treated merely as “matter.” Convinced by Lejeune’s testimony, the judge ruled in the woman’s favor. But the state’s highest court later ruled that the embryos were not human beings. That decision was in turn upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court ...

I live in East Tennessee, not far from the courtroom where this hearing took place. Having studied this case and the testimonies (I used Le Jeune's testimony in a book), I'm now convinced that had this wonderful geneticist centered and focused his argument upon the difference between an organ (or subunit thereof) and an organism, this defense of embryo-aged human beings would have been a world changing one, stopping the degredation into the pit of dehumanizing humans at their earliest age.

27 posted on 01/04/2007 7:02:26 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
“All scientists know when life begins,” Lejeune stated. “If the scientic establishment had told the truth, then the Supreme Court would not have said in Roe v. Wade that science does not know when life begins.” This wonderful man is mistaken in this ... the subpreme court knew what they wanted to rule and where they wanted the society to go before even hearing the testimonies in Roe, and they knew they were fomenting a gross lie but it fit the direction they wanted America to move.
28 posted on 01/04/2007 7:08:44 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

Wonderful read, thank you. It's unfortunate that, despite Dr. Lejeune's impeccable credentials, most pro-aborts will dismiss everything he has to say because he's a Catholic.


55 posted on 01/05/2007 7:37:56 AM PST by workerbee (Democrats are a waste of tax money and good oxygen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson