Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UpAllNight
Then you retract your definition of 'human' as a cell that contains the human dna?

Please post my quote making that claim.

Since you can't do that, you can apologise for making it up out of whole cloth or simply slink away from whre ever you slink to.

136 posted on 01/05/2007 11:02:47 AM PST by jwalsh07 (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

--This would be the scientific definition. Science has been knind enough to allow us to quantify this definition by sequencing the genome which leaves anti-science nuts gaping for air and defining humans as you do above.--

This implies that 'it' is human if it contains the human DNA sequence. Since we were referring to a single cell, you are implying that the definition of human is extended to a single cell if it contains the human DNA sequence.


140 posted on 01/05/2007 11:12:52 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson