Skip to comments.
Senators seek repeal of alternative minimum tax
Marketwatch ^
| Jan 4, 2007 5:37 PM ET
| William L. Watts, MarketWatch
Posted on 01/04/2007 4:04:39 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It is a sneaky, underhanded massive tax increase on the middle class.
In a million, billion years the democrat party will not vote this reform to eliminate the AMT.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
In the House, new Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., has said that fixing AMT is a top priority but that lawmakers will need political cover from the White House as they seek to make up lost revenues.Typical politician. That's code word for...we're going to increase taxes (or "fees") somewhere else. Why do the politicians (on both sides) never stop to consider that, instead of raising taxes, they could perhaps cut some of the unnecessary pork?
3
posted on
01/04/2007 4:08:57 PM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(Sic Semper Tyrannis * Allen for U.S. Senate in '08)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'd say let affluent Democrats pay higher taxes. Its only fair! If the AMT is repealed, the Democrats are advocating tax cuts for the rich. This will not stand!!!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
yeah,
the biggest opportunity for REAL tax reform in decades, and the gop chose to look the other way.
5
posted on
01/04/2007 4:13:26 PM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I channel surfed upon a show and a young women was walking actually strutting and describing that through hard work she was now in middle class. She was describing her $200.00 jeans. I went ballistic, especially when the announcer then described how hard it was to achieve middle class....maybe if one did not buy $200.00 jeans one could achieve financial stability.
6
posted on
01/04/2007 4:13:57 PM PST
by
Kimmers
(It's not what you take when you leave this world behind, it's what you leave behind when you go)
To: Kimmers
"$200.00 jeans"
Dynachrome likes to waste money, but that's over the top!
7
posted on
01/04/2007 4:15:25 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
8
posted on
01/04/2007 4:16:04 PM PST
by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: All
Repealing the AMT would reduce revenues by $750 billion through 2016 Even "I know" this is not how tax cuts work.
9
posted on
01/04/2007 4:19:33 PM PST
by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
'The new Congress intends to provide tax relief to middle-income Americans in a fiscally responsible way, and the AMT is the right place to start.'
Sen. Max Baucus "Fiscally responsible" = government code word for "until the Sun stops giving off light and our solar system comes to an end, causing the permanent extinction of all humans, taxes will never, ever, ever decrease."
10
posted on
01/04/2007 4:19:46 PM PST
by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: dynachrome
I really wonder if one can tell the difference between a $200.00 pair of jeans and a $20.00 pair.....I am sure they shrink, fade and get dirty about the same.
11
posted on
01/04/2007 4:20:52 PM PST
by
Kimmers
(It's not what you take when you leave this world behind, it's what you leave behind when you go)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Eliminating the AMT would be a big, big accomplishment. I doubt whether the Democrats would do this in a million years, but if they allow the issue to be raised, a lot of people will support it.
They may have plans to add some other tax instead, but I say go ahead and try to do it. It was the one big failure in Bush's tax cuts that he didn't try to touch the AMT.
Clinton, of course, raised it.
12
posted on
01/04/2007 4:20:59 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
D.O.A., with little fanfare, sent to a subcommittee for study, no doubt.
To: Kimmers
I really wonder if one can tell the difference between a $200.00 pair of jeans and a $20.00 pair.....I am sure they shrink, fade and get dirty about the same.Aren't the $200 jeans the ones that are sandblasted to make them look worn and faded?
14
posted on
01/04/2007 4:24:40 PM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(All we are sa-a-a-ying, is give Beast a chance.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just the sound of alternative minimum tax sounds Obscene..
It has a nasty parasitical sound to it..
15
posted on
01/04/2007 4:26:10 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
To: Fresh Wind
or they are washed with rocks....
16
posted on
01/04/2007 4:29:23 PM PST
by
Kimmers
(It's not what you take when you leave this world behind, it's what you leave behind when you go)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Uh, could they make the repeal retroactive? Please?
17
posted on
01/04/2007 4:33:58 PM PST
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What exactly is middle income?
18
posted on
01/04/2007 4:37:44 PM PST
by
Hambone02
(USAF AMMO IYAAYAS)
To: dynachrome

a girl at work has three pair... all LASER cut and sewn to her measurements, and they fit her perfectly.
toooo bad she doesn't have a perfect body, lotta money that still can't hide the extra 100lbs. 8^)
19
posted on
01/04/2007 4:41:27 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
scratchin my head...isn't it the Rats who claim there is no middle class ?
20
posted on
01/04/2007 4:44:25 PM PST
by
stylin19a
("no ZamZam water for you")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson