Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SES1066
The documents show that the FBI was aware in 1971 that Rehnquist had owned a home in Phoenix with a deed that allowed him to sell only to whites. The restrictive covenant was not disclosed until his 1986 confirmation hearings, at which Rehnquist said he became aware of the clause only days earlier.

Those clauses were quite common years ago. When I helped my parents sell their house in the suburbs of Philadelphia in the late 70s, I (and they) were surprised to see such a clause in their deed. I wondered what the title company would do with it, particularly since the couple buying their house was Black. When I got the title report there was a simple notation to the effect that the clause (referenced only by number) was no longer legally enforceable.

7 posted on 01/04/2007 11:28:57 AM PST by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blau993

The restrictive covenant thing was essentially meaningless anyway, because the Supreme Court had already ruled in 1948 that government enforcement of racially restrictive covenants is unconstitutional.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer


16 posted on 01/04/2007 12:55:15 PM PST by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson