Hijab, the Islamic veil, is thus not ”just a piece of cloth”. It serves as a demarcation line between proper, submissive Muslim women and whores, un-Islamic women who deserve no respect and are asking for rape.
Having lived as a dhimmi expatriate in islamic countries, I see the hijab in a slightly different way. Its nothing less than a slave rag, to stamp the female victims of islam as slaves and animals were branded with the mark of their owners. It's used as an anti-rape marker for the muslim male to humiliate and subjugate "his" female(s) with, by marking them as claimed property with in the way a dog would pee on a shrub.
Muslim females, who have little choice (due to pressure from both within their own family, society, or the various kinds of "islamic moral" enforcers) but to be marked as a slave of islam (and therefore, their male keepers)
What I have often fond interesting is how female slaves of islam come to terms with their cognitive dissonance about islam, and their inner desire to be more like their sisters in the non-islumic world who can choose their own mates, divorce abusive husbands, and partake of some of the freedoms and rights they see non-muslims often take for granted.
Under threats, and lacking the will or the means to live without being branded, they will often kid themselves about the joys of hijab, or how it "liberates them from the lecherous stares" and wandering paws of muslim males, in the way a slave would come to terms with their hopeless situation, and say how they have learned to be thankful because they have been blessed with a "good master" who "takes care" of them. It's as if this bizarre rationalization serves as a crude band aid to protect them from facing the unpleasant reality and the true hopelessness of their predicament.
It's one once one digs deeper that the real truth is revealed...
BTW, a couple more links etc on the "Religion of Rape™" I posted in another thread:
The Rape Jihad By Robert Spencer.
(Fjordman)...Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. And Muslims do follow their medieval religious laws, even today....
And my all time favorite:
If a female was raped due to her not maintaining the laws of Hijaab, she is partly to be blamed as the rapist will be considered as being seduced by her revealing form and shape. She should make Tawbah (sincerely repent) by also adhering to the laws of Hijaab.and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best
Mufti Ebrahim Desai
FATWA DEPT.
As your posts pointed out, the wild-eyed PETA and femnazis have been strangely silent about the abuses of women, children and animals under Islam. IMHO, that is because they have already sold out to Satan in promoting animal and environmental "rights" over human rights, political goals over the spiritual development of individuals (who together make up our society), and "diversity" over truth. There can be only one truth, but they hold all claims to have competing merit with the words of Moses and Christ reflected in our founding documents.
The older I get, the more clearly I see that anything that is not of the true God has its origin in God's mirror opposite. Our God can work even through evil to achieve good; the "gods" of the Islamists and secularists work through good to achieve evil. They use the language of social justice to achieve social fascism, then stand silent in the face of horrible abuses. Instead of love and respect for God and the achievement of self-mastery, they teach hatred of free will and the compulsion to obedience.
Our European forefathers fought a Protestant revolution to throw off the abuses of the Holy Roman Empire and the American revolution to throw off Anglican domination. Now the emotionally dependent Left invites ayatollah domination. Pity the fools.