Why would they redact, though? Maybe it was Clinton's lawyer. Probably did not want the embarrassment of letting it be known he hired a lawyer to look over those documents for his defense.
This may be far fetched, but if clarke were the redacted agent I could see why they would want that under wraps.
Clarke was serving in his position at the pleasure of GWB at the time and clarke was probably coordinating his testimony with berger et al.
Just a guess.
> Why would they redact, though? Maybe it was Clinton's lawyer.
If you mean David Kendall, that guy would never allow his name to appear in a document.