Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
The question is what was so damning Berger was willing to take one for the team

Maybe how they didn't take terrorism seriously and were more concerned about being PC because of lawsuits

Or maybe it's something like Chinagate and they didn't want to target certain donors of Clinton?

Oh heck .. with the Clinton's .. it could be anything

32 posted on 01/04/2007 12:13:54 AM PST by Mo1 (YEA, What Onyx said in her tagline !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1

In December, Bush met with Clinton for a two-hour, one-on-one discussion of national security and foreign policy challenges. Clinton recalled saying to Bush, "I think you will find that by far your biggest threat is Bin Ladin and the al Qaeda." Clinton told us that he also said, "One of the great regrets of my presidency is that I didn't get him [Bin Ladin] for you, because I tried to."159 Bush told the Commission that he felt sure President Clinton had mentioned terrorism, but did not remember much being said about al Qaeda. Bush recalled that Clinton had emphasized other issues such as North Korea and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.160

In early January, Clarke briefed Rice on terrorism. He gave similar presentations-describing al Qaeda as both an adaptable global network of jihadist organizations and a lethal core terrorist organization-to Vice President-elect Cheney, Hadley, and Secretary of State-designate Powell. One line in the briefing slides said that al Qaeda had sleeper cells in more than 40 countries, including the United States.161 Berger told us that he made a point of dropping in on Clarke's briefing of Rice to emphasize the importance of the issue. Later the same day, Berger met with Rice. He says that he told her the Bush administration would spend more time on terrorism in general and al Qaeda in particular than on anything else. Rice's recollection was that Berger told her she would be surprised at how much more time she was going to spend on terrorism than she expected, but that the bulk of their conversation dealt with the faltering Middle East peace process and North Korea. Clarke said that the new team, having been out of government for eight years, had a steep learning curve to understand al Qaeda and the new transnational terrorist threat.162


37 posted on 01/04/2007 12:18:11 AM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1

"Or maybe it's something like Chinagate and they didn't want to target certain donors of Clinton?"

Bingo! This is the reason they were against Able Danger and any monitoring of communications from our enemies to America's rats in congress and the media.


217 posted on 01/04/2007 9:28:21 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Republican voters = a large viable group of responsible citizens. CINO Non voters aren't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson