To: Jim Robinson
The NARA investigation report said Clinton signed an April 12, 2002, letter designating Berger... Clinton was not president in 2002. Why did they have to grant him access?
23 posted on
01/04/2007 12:07:02 AM PST by
wai-ming
To: wai-ming
Because he had to designate him as the guy for access for the 911 Commission.
25 posted on
01/04/2007 12:07:46 AM PST by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: wai-ming
But....now that you asked that, that is a GOOD question.
Why would a man who no longer had control over those papers have to designate somebody to look at them.
29 posted on
01/04/2007 12:09:14 AM PST by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: wai-ming; Howlin
Clinton was not president in 2002. Why did they have to grant him access?Draft docs like that are controlled by the administration that created them for 12 years. I think the currrent admin can, of course, see them. But they cannot be released to others without Clinton's approval. In fact, I think this is one useful function Prez Libraries actually perform. As these docs are declassified by the current admin, they go to the previous admin for 2nd review before release (or hide).
170 posted on
01/04/2007 7:49:57 AM PST by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson