And yet you avoid any discussion of this case. Why?
why does it bother you that i won't discuss this case. why do you care what my opinion is. and, indeed, i gave it, i said i can see the parents point in what they did but i have grave concerns about unlimited ability to surgically alter another human being. is that not understandable? do you not agree that often one side of a debate is stifled on FR by those that scream that we are not to judge? that is my primary concern here and guess what? i am entitled to have an interest other than the one factually presented on the thread. and i think it's an important one. i will understand if you don't share it and won't think any less of you for it : )