[xsmommy]

STEP BACK and tell me what YOU see as the outer limits of what is acceptable to do. i am not here to discuss the nitty gritty of this case with you or anyone else. what i am doing is advocating DEBATE and stating that there is REASONABLENESS on both sides of it. i am saying shove the dang THOU SHALT NOT JUDGE flag, because i am tired of it being waved so as to cut off debate of issues that are in vital need of it.

[Hildy]

And who, in your estimation, should make the final decision? Hmm? A court? A priest? A Doctor? Who?

[r9etb]

STEP BACK and tell me what YOU see as the outer limits of what is acceptable to do. i am not here to discuss the nitty gritty of this case with you or anyone else.

That's chickening out.

Let's just set the parameters, shall we? Does this case, in your estimation, fall inside or outside the limits?

If outside, why?