Skip to comments.
Duncan Hunter's Bio [GOP presidential contender]
Peace Through Strength PAC ^
Posted on 01/03/2007 10:20:08 AM PST by Antoninus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 361-369 next last
To: no dems
Please do not lose that info. We'll need it posted numerous times between now and '08. My tagline has been the same ever since the November 7 elections.
You were on board before me, then. All you need to do is a FReep-search for "Duncan Hunter" to see the articles that have been posted on him over the past two months. They're attracting hundreds of posts each. And the ping-list is growing.
Interest in Hunter is starting to well up. We've just got to get his name and record out there. Naysayers be darned.
161
posted on
01/03/2007 9:40:47 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: miliantnutcase
What I love is that this guy actually has DONE stuff in congress. Unlike *cough*kerry*cough*
"...Unlike *cough*Hastert*cough* and *cough*Foley*cough* and *cough*Duke Cunningham*cough* and........"
162
posted on
01/03/2007 9:41:20 PM PST
by
no dems
(Duncan Hunter for Prez / John Bolton for VEEP in '08)
To: Antoninus
Ah, it was only a matter of time until you made an appearance on a Hunter thread.Why would you say such a stupid thing?
163
posted on
01/03/2007 9:44:09 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: Howlin
Why would you say such a stupid thing?
Stupid? Why? Your appearance on a thread usually means that the topic has "hit the big time".
Would you vote for Duncan Hunter if he were the nominee?
164
posted on
01/03/2007 9:49:43 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: Antoninus
Your appearance on a thread usually means that the topic has "hit the big time".Like I said, stupid.
And I'm not here to answer YOUR questions, bud.
165
posted on
01/03/2007 9:51:00 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: Antoninus
Interest in Hunter is starting to well up. I'm a moderate, and I'm on the record as a (default) Guiliani supporter.
That said, I've read enough about Hunter over the past week to make me seriously examine my decision.
Feel free to consider that progress. ;-)
166
posted on
01/03/2007 9:51:12 PM PST
by
Wormwood
(Goldwater Republican.)
To: Howlin
Like I said, stupid. And I'm not here to answer YOUR questions, bud.
Gosh, you're hostile. Nonetheless, welcome aboard!
167
posted on
01/03/2007 9:53:33 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: Antoninus; Howlin
"Your appearance on a thread usually means that the topic has "hit the big time"."Aw geez Antoninus... Don't pump her head up any bigger than it already is, please!!!
She's only on this thread cause she's turned moderate and anti-conservative. She actually thinks she can talk lurkers and even some posters out of supporting Duncan. That's what it's all about... You bettcha!!!
168
posted on
01/03/2007 9:58:27 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
(EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
To: Wormwood
That said, I've read enough about Hunter over the past week to make me seriously examine my decision. Feel free to consider that progress. ;-)
Hey, why not. Rudy only looks good on paper and in the polls being conducted by the MSM. If he becomes the nominee, the MSM will be dancing in the aisles--five seconds before they begin the most vicious smear campaign in history to drive a wedge between Giuliani and the conservative base of the GOP. If you think the Mark Foley trick was dirty, it will be a peck on the cheek compared to what they'll unload on Giuliani. The man's got more baggage than the cast of the View filming on location in Aruba.
By the time they're done, Rudy would be lucky to get 35% of the vote in a general election. And I shudder to think what that will do to the down-ticket races...
We've got to prevent that from happening.
169
posted on
01/03/2007 9:59:00 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: Antoninus
Gosh, you're hostile.You mock me for being on this thread and then call me hostile?
170
posted on
01/03/2007 9:59:03 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: SierraWasp
171
posted on
01/03/2007 10:00:38 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: SierraWasp
She's only on this thread cause she's turned moderate and anti-conservative. She actually thinks she can talk lurkers and even some posters out of supporting Duncan. That's what it's all about... You bettcha!!!
No worries. She's still a FReeper in good standing. We need naysayers on the Hunter threads anyway. If Hunter's got weaknesses, better to have them exposed now. So far, the best they can do is to say: "He's not electable because I said so."
172
posted on
01/03/2007 10:02:03 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: Antoninus
We need naysayers on the Hunter threads anyway. And to be fair, some of us are here to learn about the guy.
173
posted on
01/03/2007 10:05:33 PM PST
by
Wormwood
(Goldwater Republican.)
To: Howlin
You mock me for being on this thread and then call me hostile?
That wasn't mocking. It was stating a fact. Indeed, I was surprised you hadn't appeared on a Hunter thread before now, considering they're getting hundreds of posts.
What's your opinion on Hunter? Would you vote for him?
174
posted on
01/03/2007 10:06:55 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: Wormwood
And to be fair, some of us are here to learn about the guy.
Right! Count me in that group as well. Hunter's only been on my radar screen for three weeks, but he's immediately vaulted to my #1 choice. Seems like a rock-solid guy with great credentials.
175
posted on
01/03/2007 10:08:40 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: Antoninus
I like what I have read so far, but I don't know enough about him to make an opinion.
176
posted on
01/03/2007 10:08:54 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: Antoninus
We need naysayers on the Hunter threads anyway.You mean you've been having these threads and the FR Prig Patrol hasn't turned up like they do on the Rudy and Mitt threads to try to destroy them?
177
posted on
01/03/2007 10:10:27 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: Howlin
I like what I have read so far, but I don't know enough about him to make an opinion.
Fair enough. As I said before, welcome aboard!
178
posted on
01/03/2007 10:10:54 PM PST
by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
To: Antoninus; Hildy; Howlin
But she and Hildy are NOT here to expose supposed weaknesses... They are hear seeking whom they may drive away!!! They are trying to say that conservatives are too rigid and controversial to get elected which of course is totally bogus from the get-go!!!
Of course if they themselves are still any kind of conservatives, they look to me to be "complacent conservatives" that will swallow the conservative lite types like Rudy and maybe even McCain as long as they have the support of the MSM until the general election where they'll be slaughtered, of course.
179
posted on
01/03/2007 10:11:45 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
(EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
To: SierraWasp
They are trying to say that conservatives are too rigid and controversial to get elected which of course is totally bogus from the get-go!!! No, we're saying that jerks like you, who give the GOP an ugly face, are too damn uncompromising. You're never satisified with anything.
Reading your other posts, I can understand why you're always in such an uproar; you're shockingly misinformed.
180
posted on
01/03/2007 10:15:02 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 361-369 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson