To: leadpenny
Well, they then either lose or gain viewers or listeners. The decider is the marketplace, as it should be.Oh, really? You seem to be of the opinion that there is no unacceptable speech:
- The radio talk-show-host details exactly how he intends to kill the President, complete with schedule and where he has purchased the supplies.
- The Wahhabi Network, broadcasting from Dearborn, MI, exhorts the many Muslims in the area to overthrow the local government with violent force.
- Knowing full well that it is slander, and proceeding anyways, a TV announcer proclaims a local prominent businessman of pedophilia, making up offenses and claiming, falsely, various recent arrests.
65 posted on
01/03/2007 8:46:43 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(I just want to be loved from the bellybutton down. Is that so wrong?)
To: Lazamataz
Like pornography . . . I know it when I see it.
What I heard on Imus this morning was not a threat . . . it was entertainment.
To: Lazamataz
What's next on MSNBC, a mock hanging of the President?
No telling what Abrams will do next.
To: Lazamataz
Imus et al's snickers and talk like I imagine that Harris and Klebold engaged in prior to their killings at Columbine High School. Dispicable juvenile visualizing and boasting...followed (in their case) by irresponsible murders.
98 posted on
01/03/2007 9:25:32 AM PST by
Carolinamom
(Thank God that Mary and Joseph were not pro-choicers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson