To: hedgetrimmer
I think you are against nafta if I remember.
Everyone across the globe is trying to form localized free trade zones though.
4 posted on
01/02/2007 7:51:02 PM PST by
staytrue
To: staytrue
Implicit in what I have said, and certainly what I believe, is that for North American monetary and financial integration to be successful, it would have to involve an elimination of all barriers to labor migration. This is likely to be seen as an economic necessity and a political difficulty.
North American Monetary and Financial Integration: Notes on the US Perspective
"free trade" eliminates borders and destroys sovereignty. The Bush administration amnesty and unfettered illegal immigration are the result of "free trade" and the President's global agenda.
7 posted on
01/02/2007 8:26:48 PM PST by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: staytrue
The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union
When the United States joined other international organizations like the IMF, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, and the North American Free Trade Agreement, the expected economic and political gains appeared to offset
the surrender of some national sovereignty. In this tradition, the United States may well find it worthwhile to join the proposed monetary union.
10 posted on
01/02/2007 8:30:59 PM PST by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson