Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swmobuffalo

Tinian is a bit over the top in his presentation, but he does have a point. If Henley found this hook on public land, it isn't his. Artifacts found in the US generally belong to the landowner. If the landowner in this case is the state or federal government, Henley has no right to keep or sell it. He may have no CHOICE but to donate the artifact.

If he was on private land and had permission from the landowner to be there, then he has himself a nice (and likely valuable) artifact. If it was public land, it needs to be turned over to whatever agency manages the land.


29 posted on 01/02/2007 4:24:41 PM PST by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Arthalion
If the landowner in this case is the state or federal government, Henley has no right to keep or sell it.

Protection of antiquities on federal lands started with the Antiquities Act of 1906.

Almost all (or all?) states have similar laws pertaining to public property.

35 posted on 01/02/2007 4:33:09 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Arthalion

Found on a sand bar in the Missouri River.


41 posted on 01/02/2007 4:47:24 PM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson