Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raymann

Raymann, you are wrong.

There is no settlement between wireless companies for (local to local) calls. This same non-settlement scenario prevails more and more for wireline calls too.

Access charges do remain for the receiving company on any scenario where a long distance call is delivered to the local company, either wireless or wireline. And in this scenario, ATT attempts to cheat on their payments across the board.


7 posted on 01/02/2007 9:30:49 AM PST by off-roader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: off-roader

You could be right, I haven't read up on that in a while.


8 posted on 01/02/2007 9:50:26 AM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: off-roader
Raymann, you are wrong.

No he isn't.

He is talking about roaming charges, although using Verizon and Cingular as examples won't work since they use different technologies. Inter-carrier roaming settlement charges amount to several tens of millions of dollars a day.

I'm not sure what you mean about AT&T "cheating" on their long distance access payments. Wireless-to-wireline long distance is handled on a wholesale basis. I don't know of any wireless company that charges its customers long distance any more.

15 posted on 01/02/2007 11:36:12 AM PST by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson