Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News Analysis: For Sunnis, Dictator’s Degrading End Signals Ominous Dawn for the New Iraq [barf]
New York Times ^ | January 1, 2007 | SABRINA TAVERNISE

Posted on 01/01/2007 5:30:26 PM PST by 68skylark

For Sunni Arabs here, the ugly reality of the new Iraq seemed to crystallize in a two-minute segment of Saddam Hussein’s hanging, filmed surreptitiously on a cellphone.

The video featured excited taunting of Mr. Hussein by hooded Shiite guards. Passed around from cellphone to cellphone on Sunday, the images had echoes of the videos Sunni militants take of beheadings.

“Yes, he was a dictator, but he was killed by a death squad,” said a Sunni Arab woman in western Baghdad who was too afraid to give her name. “What’s the difference between him and them?”

There was, of course, a difference. Mr. Hussein was a brutal dictator, while the Shiite organizers of the execution are members of the popularly elected Iraqi government that the United States helped put in place as an attempt to implant a democracy.

It was supposed to be a formal and solemn proceeding carried out by a dispassionate state. But the grainy recording of the execution’s cruel theater summed up what has become increasingly clear on the streets of the capital: that the Shiite-led government that assumed power in the American effort here is running the state under an undisguised sectarian banner.

The hanging was hasty. Laws governing its timing were bypassed, and the guards charged with keeping order in the chamber instead disrupted it, shouting Shiite militia slogans.

It was a degrading end for a vicious leader, and an ominous beginning for the new Iraq. The Bush administration has already scaled back its hopes for a democracy here. But as the Iraqi government has become ever more set on protecting its Shiite constituency, often at the expense of the Sunni minority, the goal of stopping the sectarian war seems to be slipping out of reach.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
I guess this "news analysis" has the new MSM spin on Saddam's execution.

It was rushed and botched (because Saddam was may have been "taunted"). Laws were ignored. It'll just make things worse. And check out the snark in paragraph four -- the author says there's no real difference between the actions of Saddam and the actions of the new government, only a difference in their paths to power.

Personally I'm glad Saddam is gone.

1 posted on 01/01/2007 5:30:29 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Everyone would be better off if the Sunnis offed al Sadr.


2 posted on 01/01/2007 5:32:18 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

I am glad he is gone too, befor e he could be freed by some Sunni team. It is too bad the idiot Shiites couldn't conduct things in a better fashion, still it was ten thousand times better than being thrown off a building and a million times better than being ground up by a chipper.


3 posted on 01/01/2007 5:34:18 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Gosh, New York Times, get with the new multiculturalism. Taunting people at hangings is S.O.P. in Iraq. And in most of the rest of the Arab world.

Please, don't try to impose your snooty western values on them. Be a little more broad-minded.


4 posted on 01/01/2007 5:35:39 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

I wish they had put panties on his head or made him pile up with a bunch of nekked prisoners. Screw the feelings of the throat slittin arab street.


5 posted on 01/01/2007 5:36:03 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
“What’s the difference between him and them?”
Uhmmm...the number of people he killed [thousands] vs. the the number of people they killed [1]--just for starters.
6 posted on 01/01/2007 5:36:22 PM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Since FR strives to be scrupulously non-partisan, I'll also post the "spin" or conventional wisdom on the Saddam execution from the right, from Austin Bay:
The Strong Man expects to die in one of two ways — with a nine millimeter ballot (ie, assassination) — or old age. That has certainly been the case in the Middle East. A public, legal trial followed by court-sentenced execution? That isn’t going to happen unless…unless a democracy replaces a tyranny. This is astonishing news — history altering news. For centuries the terrible yin-yang of tyrant and terrorist has trapped the Middle East. In 2003 the US-led coalition began the difficult but worthy effort of breaking that tyrant’s and terrorist’s trap, and offering another choice in the politically dysfunctional Arab Muslim Middle East.

Saddam’s demise serves as object lesson and example. In late 2003 every Middle Eastern autocrat saw the haggard Saddam pulled from the hole; now they’ve seen him hung. The larger message: To avoid Saddams fate means political liberalization. The message extends beyond the Arab Muslim Middle East. Iran’s mullahs see it. At some reptilian level, destructive despots like Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe also understand it.

Frankly, I doubt Robert Mugabe will get any message at all from this. But except for that quibble, I think the views in this quote are correct.
7 posted on 01/01/2007 5:43:57 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

To be fair, the NYSlimes probably was talking about the Shia militias, which have killed hundreds, maybe thousands (among them also terorists, Baathists and "Insurgents"!)
Saddam was resposible for aprox. 2,000,000 deaths (genocide, murder and wars).

Anyway since the latter is dead (yipee!), it's time to crush the first, since they are certifiable Islamo-Nuts endangering our troops and stability.


8 posted on 01/01/2007 5:45:07 PM PST by SolidWood (Sadr lives. Kill him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Aha! You have a point.


9 posted on 01/01/2007 5:51:22 PM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

10 posted on 01/01/2007 5:51:43 PM PST by Silly (sarcasmoff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

I thought our mission was to create a viable democracy in Iraq? If so, the chanting of sectarian slogans during Saadam's well deserved end was akin to spitting on our troops. Many have died in an attempt to better than country but the executioners' behavior, as recorded on cell phone cams, makes the task all the more harder.


11 posted on 01/01/2007 5:53:49 PM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

Exactly.


12 posted on 01/01/2007 5:57:58 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

not even close.

this death sentence as carried out is light years ahead of most governments on the earth.

What is spitting on our troops is the international law norms regime that continues to fund and apologize for these tyrants.

Good riddance to saddam.


13 posted on 01/01/2007 5:59:25 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

It's entertaining to me to see how the same media that excoriated the Serbs now feels sorry for the Sunnis in Iraq. This minority group maintained a decades-long tyranny over the majority of the people in Iraq. No wonder the Sunnis are worried now.


14 posted on 01/01/2007 6:01:02 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

You even bother to read my post or was it too complicated for you? How's about I simplify:

US troops fight and die to make Iraq a democracy - Saddam's
executioners engage in actions that make a mockery of US troops' sacrifices. That's a bad thing.


15 posted on 01/01/2007 6:04:50 PM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

I did read your post.

I think you over state your case.

The idea that the execution was not going to be an emotional reaction is unrealistic.

I would like Iraq to be a 21st century American democracy but I think we should respect the accomplishments of our troops. This verdict and execution is an accomplishment. I think the humiliation of Saddam at his hanging is unprofessional but globally significant to a world with still too many tyrants.

I think we should respect the autonomy of the Iraqis to execute as they see fit. Ironically, I think the mistakes of the Sadr chants made public will help drive the democratic engines of Iraq against the Shiites. The fact that the impatience of the public is manipulated to demean the results is unfortunate in my mind.


16 posted on 01/01/2007 6:21:25 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
chanting of sectarian slogans during Saddam's well deserved end was akin to spitting on our troops.

I agree with this sentiment 100%. This tribalism was a disgrace. Sadr Brigade retards, who in the past couldn't so much as look Hussein in the eye, taunting him as if it were they and not our American heroes who brought him to justice.

It was an insult to our troops. I do not give a damn about Saddam. I would have hung him myself. But to be hung by thugs chanting the praises of that rotten toothed, shoulda been dead long ago Moqtar Sadr, the ambush murderer of US troops was enough for me to say to hell with all these Iraqi bastards.

I say we take out any who would openly oppose us starting with Moqtar Sadr. To do less is an affront to the sacrifices of our troops.

Regards.

17 posted on 01/01/2007 7:09:48 PM PST by ARE SOLE (I thought the Party was supposed to court the voters and not the other way around?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
The Nuremberg trials and the hangings which followed weren't exactly smooth, to put it mildly . . . and the allies were fully in charge, not some anti-nazi new German government.

I recall reading about a number of problems with those hangings-- the trap doors were two small, the prisoners disfigured their faces banging the too small openings going through . . . the British were so appalled that they sent their own professional to conduct the future hangings.

Certainly, I would have much preferred that Saddam's hanging be conducted in a more professional and dignified manner-- forcing him to wear a hood as proper protocol even though he refused it, singing him a couple of hymns before the trap door was sprung and so forth.

But the United States didn't conduct the hanging-- they handed the prisoner over in respose to a legal request from Iraq's freely elected government officials.

From what I could see, they conducted the hanging in a fairly dignified manner under the circumstances-- giving him a cloth wrap around the neck before affixing the noose and dropping him sufficiently to acheive a fairly quick and painless death, in sharp contrast to how victims of his regime were executed. Recall also that standard hanging protocol in the Middle East is nowhere near as advanced as what was done with Saddam. Iran, f'rinstance, uses a crane to hoist the condemned off the ground. Syria uses a short-drop "dangle and strangle" method. It appeard that the gallows used for Saddam was built by a professional or at least someone with the engineering know-how to ensure the prisoner was humanely hanged.

Agreed that the taunts were out of order, but they don't come anywhere close to the indignity of being dropped into a plastic shredder.

18 posted on 01/01/2007 7:12:25 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

It is simply BS NYT tripe. Nothing else. They cannot come out and admit they were rooting for Saddam at the NYT all along, so they have to write it the way they did.

The key thing to keep in mind is that they are ALL liberals at the NYT, and liberals are liberals BEFORE they are Americans. That is why so many liberals (including the liberal Supreme Court Justices) are gung-ho for a single world government like the UN.

Like all liberals, they are disturbed that it took two years and not twenty or more to try, convict and carry out the sentence.

Like all liberals, they are upset that the death penalty was actually carried out. Now there can be no more "Free Saddam" signs like the "Free Mumia" signs liberals are so fond of.

Like all liberals, the writers and workers at the NYT are deeply saddened.

I am too.

Saddam should have been handed over the the families of people who were fed into that plastic shredding machine (like this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-hnCT6a9Co ) by Saddam and his henchmen.


19 posted on 01/01/2007 7:18:32 PM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Not surprised at all to see the New York Times once more asking us to feel sorry for a mass murderer.

It's so typical of these people to do this ~

20 posted on 01/01/2007 7:43:35 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson