What's important here is not so much the nuts and bolts of this agreement, but the secrecy with which is has been kept from public review.
Amazing how 'selective' the MSM can be when it comes to what it wants to cover as the 'news', now isn't it?
Bernard Goldberg was 100% correct about their 'Bias'!
Good point. I have always wondered why those that support amnesty for example will not say it is amnesty, and why Republican leadership has adopted democratic style strategies of lying about their intentions. Why do they misname things in order to manipulate and deceive their own base ie. "pathway to citizenship", "jobs Americans will not do" etc.
Why do they malign those that would point out the truth, about what these changes really mean.
Why aren't people offended by the secrecy, the deception the warping of language?
Why are they highjacking our Democracy?
Regards.
Precisely. The agreements with other countries are a matter of routine and readily available upon request. They are of little or no public concern whatever -- yet they are certainly "public".
But the negotiated agreement with one state is kept under lock and key. Because it really is of public concern...and would be perceived as unnecessarily favorable to illegals and, thus, patently unfavorable to the U.S. citizen.
This is not a good sign...
"What's important here is not so much the nuts and bolts of this agreement, but the secrecy with which is has been kept from public review."
It long ago got to the point where the government had to be forced to do the right thing. Their biggest defense is not talking or admitting to anything.