Well, your behavior then was about on par with what it is now. So if I castigated you a few weeks ago about the disingenuine and disruptive purpose of your participation in this conversation, then yes. The same is true today.
Of course this little sidetrack is only designed to turn attention away from the real issue, viz. the 57,000 confirmed Islamonazis who sided with Hitler, plus all the other Nazi units we know to have had muslims in them. It's all documented history that only a habitually dishonest Islamophile would dispute.
If you claim to have books supporting your beliefs about the past and refuse to specify further, you are being intellectually dishonest. You are already a known flip-flopper.
Of course this little sidetrack is only designed to turn attention away from the real issue, viz. the 57,000 confirmed Islamonazis
You merely saying so is not "confirmation" if you have evidence beyond the mere names of a few books, present it.
plus all the other Nazi units we know to have had muslims in them.
And of course, the 18,000,000 Christian Nazi soldiers who sided with and fought directly for Hitler in the Wehrmacht.
It's all documented history that only a habitually dishonest Islamophile would dispute.
If it's documented, you'll have no reservations about providing that documentation for verification. That you are belligerently unwilling to do so indicates that this documentation does not exist.