243 is a list of names and numbers. There is no transparency as to how you arrived at those numbers and some of them are wrong. For example, in your figures of 10,000 casualties in Kilani's army you seem to be counting those who surrendered to the British in the course of the 6-week war.
Kilani formally allied with Nazi Germany and attacked the British enemies of Nazi Germany. That makes the troops who fought for him Nazi allies as well.
If that's your criterion, why are you ignoring the big picture? You've prattled on about 30,000 Muslims fighting on the side of the Nazis while you ignore the 18,000,000 overwhelmingly Christian soldiers in the Wehrmacht.
Multiple citations have been given throughout this thread and others for each unit described. You chose to ignore them at the time, and I presently lack the incentive to go back and repeat them for you. So I suggest you scroll up.
I've "scrolled up" and there are no page numbers or even specific books attached to each claim. As you have insinuated before (which suggests that this is how you operate) your unwillingness to provide specifics suggests that you're hiding something.
False. I've cited multiple sources on this thread and others (e.g. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1787520/posts?page=31#31). You ignored them at the time, and now you're using your laziness as an excuse to pretend that they did not exist.
and some of them are wrong.
You've yet to show that for so much as a single man.
For example, in your figures of 10,000 casualties in Kilani's army you seem to be counting those who surrendered to the British in the course of the 6-week war.
If the British recorded 10,000 Iraqi Nazi casualties, it follows logically that the Iraqi Nazi army was greater in number than 10,000 men.