Oh my, you are testy. But only an idiot would ignore the obvious proof...and would not stack the deck for starters. You see, even photos, eye witness accounts, being present...would not convince you simply because you are pursuing an agenda.
I clearly know that you say that you need proof as a pretence. In reality, you take the proof and either convolute it, fabricate a response that clearly a feeble attempt to discredit instead of establish dialogue towards an understanding, but to dissect it to a confortable level in order to discredit it to the unwary reader.
you and I both know, that there is no proof other than your actual presense that would convince you. Since we don't have a time machine, well....Hotshot, do the math...:))
If you provide obvious proof, I'll be happy to accept it. However, you haven't provided any proof, only allegations.
That's not "stacking the deck." That's not even "coming to the table."
I clearly know that you say that you need proof as a pretence.
I clearly know that you say you don't need proof because you have none.