Ok, i'm really sorry, but i have to call you on this one old friend.
i call BS.
i am that person that you mention.
As i recall, you claimed to have stopped reading the article after this "misrepresentation".
Funny that you're willing to give Warren et al the benefit of the doubt over his 'misstatements', yet not willing to concede that the author you're presently criticising might have made an error. Since you claim to have quit reading the article, you have no idea what was entailed in the rest of the article.
Would you like to discuss Warren's misrepresentation of scripture in order to support the questionable positions he presents in the PDC/PDL?
As I said earlier, as iron sharpens iron, my friend...
i call BS. As i recall, you claimed to have stopped reading the article after this "misrepresentation".
That's not completely true. I eventually read the entire article but I stopped responding to the points after the first point was such a blatant misrepresentation. Anything so blatantly untrue as what that author tried to pass off as fact really comes across as purposely deceitful. After that I lost complete interest in the rest of his points.