Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross
Actually, I'm not citing the "Chinese government" statistics.

You're citing a report printed in Business Week citing the World Bank report using Chinese government numbers. Which you believe is more accurate than a U.S. government report. LOL!

Only selectively. Not wholesale...and for good reason.

Which tariffs would you lower today? Because you're just like Reagan.

How about in Foreign countries for a start?

You mean like NAFTA and CAFTA?

How about eliminating the "tariff" of the U.S. capital gains tax? The "tariff" of the U.S. Corporate Income Tax? The "tariff" of the U.S. Personal Income Tax.

Sounds good to me.

We never see you doing that. Ever.

Just did. Again.

404 posted on 01/03/2007 11:58:54 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (There is no cause so right that one cannot find a fool following it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
Just did. Again.

No. You didn't. Hog-wash.

WHat do you propose go in their place? Until you do, your position is Lip service only. You spend no time or energy doing so either.

And you do spend all your time and energy promoting trade enemies who do practice mercantilistic predation on the U.S. industrial base. Espousing unilateralism. And opposing the only legitimate alternative to the existing tax structure...which you admit needs to go.

410 posted on 01/03/2007 1:27:57 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson